Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 2 (67%) |
| §103 only | 1 (33%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| EVANS, KIMBERLY L | 1 | 12.2% | +13.4% |
| KRAISINGER, EMILY MARIE | 1 | 32.8% | +45.5% |
| SHORTER, RASHIDA R | 1 | 17.8% | +25.7% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18685888 | CONDITIONAL PERFORMANCE OF ACTIONS BASED ON OBJECT STORY | EVANS, KIMBERLY L | 2d overdue |
| 18040787 | PRODUCT OBJECT STORY SIGNALING FOR CONSUMER COMMUNICATIONS | SHORTER, RASHIDA R | 5d |
| 18040790 | PRODUCT OBJECT STORY SIGNALING FOR TRACKING PRODUCT LIFECYCLE | KRAISINGER, EMILY MARIE | 14d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18685888 | CONDITIONAL PERFORMANCE OF ACTIONS BASED ON OBJECT STORY | EVANS, KIMBERLY L | 2d overdue |
| 18040787 | PRODUCT OBJECT STORY SIGNALING FOR CONSUMER COMMUNICATIONS | SHORTER, RASHIDA R | 5d |
| 18040790 | PRODUCT OBJECT STORY SIGNALING FOR TRACKING PRODUCT LIFECYCLE | KRAISINGER, EMILY MARIE | 14d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3626 | 2 |
| 3629 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18685888 | CONDITIONAL PERFORMANCE OF ACTIONS BASED ON OBJECT STORY | EVANS, KIMBERLY L | 3629 | §103 | Final Rejection | 2d overdue | Pending | Feb 22, 2024 |
| 18040790 | PRODUCT OBJECT STORY SIGNALING FOR TRACKING PRODUCT LIFECYCLE | KRAISINGER, EMILY MARIE | 3626 | §101 | Non-Final OA | 14d | Pending | Feb 06, 2023 |
| 18040787 | PRODUCT OBJECT STORY SIGNALING FOR CONSUMER COMMUNICATIONS | SHORTER, RASHIDA R | 3626 | §101 | Non-Final OA | 5d | Pending | Feb 06, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial