Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

The Regent Of The University Of Michigan

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

The Regent Of The University Of Michigan is currently addressing 1 pending office action within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. This prosecution activity involves a distinct examiner and a distinct art unit. The presence of only a pending matter suggests a focused phase of patent activity for this specific portfolio. This arrangement allows the university to concentrate its legal resources on a specific technical dialogue with the patent office.

VANHORN, ABIGAIL LOUISE serves as the busiest examiner for the company, with 1 pending office action under review. This action accounts for the total pending workload identified in the data. Prosecution strategy for the university in this area is currently tied to the findings of this individual examiner. By focusing on the specific precedents and preferences of this examiner, the university can more effectively navigate the path to allowance for this application. The involvement of a distinct examiner and a distinct art unit minimizes the complexity of managing multiple simultaneous prosecution timelines.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Double-patenting + other1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
VANHORN, ABIGAIL LOUISE 1 46.8% +22.4%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18107779 EFFICIENT AQUEOUS ENCAPSULATION AND CONTROLLED RELEASE OF BIOACTIVE AGENTS VANHORN, ABIGAIL LOUISE —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1636 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18107779 EFFICIENT AQUEOUS ENCAPSULATION AND CONTROLLED RELEASE OF BIOACTIVE AGENTS VANHORN, ABIGAIL LOUISE 1636 §103DP Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 09, 2023

Managing The Regent Of The University Of Michigan's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month