Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
The Research Foundation for the State University of New York manages a company patent portfolio in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. The data shows 1 pending office action, which is the total number of active matters currently facing the foundation. This volume indicates a focused prosecution phase where the foundation is engaged with the patent office on a specific application.
The prosecution of this portfolio is highly concentrated, involving 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This means that the active matter is being reviewed by a single individual within a specialized unit. For practitioners, this suggests that the outcome of the foundation's current patent efforts is entirely dependent on the review of this specific examiner.
ALLEN, MICHAEL D is the busiest examiner for the foundation, holding 1 busiest examiner pending action. Because this busiest examiner pending count matches the total pending office actions of 1, this individual is responsible for the entirety of the foundation's current workload. The alignment of the 1 distinct art unit with this single examiner further emphasizes the localized nature of the foundation's active patent prosecution.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALLEN, MICHAEL D | 1 | 32.0% | +49.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18314769 | COMPOSITION AND METHOD TO STABILIZE CORONAVIRUS SPIKE GLYCOPROTEINS IN PRE-FUSION CONFORMATION | ALLEN, MICHAEL D | 16d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18314769 | COMPOSITION AND METHOD TO STABILIZE CORONAVIRUS SPIKE GLYCOPROTEINS IN PRE-FUSION CONFORMATION | ALLEN, MICHAEL D | 16d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1671 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18314769 | COMPOSITION AND METHOD TO STABILIZE CORONAVIRUS SPIKE GLYCOPROTEINS IN PRE-FUSION CONFORMATION | ALLEN, MICHAEL D | 1671 | §101§102§112 | Non-Final OA | 16d | Pending | May 09, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial