Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
The Research Foundation Of The City University Of New York currently has 1 pending office action. This single 1 pending office action represents the company's active prosecution efforts at this time. The matter is being handled by 1 distinct examiner, which centralizes the current legal dialogue within a single point of contact at the patent office. Because there is only 1 distinct examiner involved, the prosecution strategy is currently focused on a singular examiner relationship.
The data indicates that there are 0 distinct art units associated with the current profile. This count of 0 distinct art units suggests that the pending matter may be in a transitional state or not yet fully categorized within the standard art unit structure. DONOHUE, SEAN R serves as the busiest examiner for the portfolio, managing the 1 pending office action currently assigned. Since DONOHUE, SEAN R is responsible for the active workload, this examiner handles the company's current patent examination. This concentration under a single official simplifies the tracking of deadlines and examiner preferences for the current portfolio.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| DONOHUE, SEAN R | 1 | 41.4% | +21.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18687784 | REAGENTS FOR SITE-SPECIFIC LABELING OF PROTEINS WITH RADIOHALOGENS, AND METHODS OF MAKING AND USING THE SAME | DONOHUE, SEAN R | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18687784 | REAGENTS FOR SITE-SPECIFIC LABELING OF PROTEINS WITH RADIOHALOGENS, AND METHODS OF MAKING AND USING THE SAME | DONOHUE, SEAN R | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18687784 | REAGENTS FOR SITE-SPECIFIC LABELING OF PROTEINS WITH RADIOHALOGENS, AND METHODS OF MAKING AND USING THE SAME | DONOHUE, SEAN R | — | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Feb 28, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial