Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
The Sovereign Corporation holds a company patent portfolio with 1 pending office action. This 1 pending office action is being handled by 1 distinct examiner. No technology area is specified for this portfolio in the provided data, which may reflect a specialized or emerging field of innovation for the company. Having 1 pending office action and 1 distinct examiner means the company's immediate patenting goals are concentrated on the outcome of 1 pending matter.
The portfolio shows 0 distinct art units for the pending matter. MCCARRY JR, ROBERT J is the busiest examiner, with 1 busiest examiner pending office action. The 1 pending office action is managed by 1 distinct examiner, indicating a concentrated prosecution status for the company. This means the company's current patenting efforts are entirely focused on the review of this 1 examiner. With 1 pending office action and 1 distinct examiner, the company has a direct and singular engagement with the patent office. The absence of a recorded art unit for the 1 pending office action highlights the unique nature of the company's current prosecution path under the 1 distinct examiner, requiring a targeted approach to address that individual's specific requirements.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCCARRY JR, ROBERT J | 1 | 81.8% | +16.8% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18738965 | SOLAR ENERGY INTERMODAL CONTAINER SYSTEM AND METHODS | MCCARRY JR, ROBERT J | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18738965 | SOLAR ENERGY INTERMODAL CONTAINER SYSTEM AND METHODS | MCCARRY JR, ROBERT J | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18738965 | SOLAR ENERGY INTERMODAL CONTAINER SYSTEM AND METHODS | MCCARRY JR, ROBERT J | — | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 10, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial