Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
The Structural Battery Company Ltd. has 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This action is being processed by a distinct examiner in a distinct art unit, which creates a very focused prosecution environment. The applicant can direct all their legal and technical resources toward resolving the specific issues in this single matter.
The busiest examiner, LARSEN, JEFFREY R, handles the 1 pending office action. As the only examiner currently engaged with the company's pending applications, LARSEN, JEFFREY R'S interpretation of the prior art will be the primary driver of the prosecution's outcome. The absence of multiple examiners or art units simplifies the administrative burden but increases the importance of this single interaction.
The presence of a single art unit allows the company to focus on the specific examination trends and standards of that administrative group. Practitioners should prioritize a clear and persuasive response to the feedback from LARSEN, JEFFREY R to move the case toward allowance. This streamlined approach is an effective way to manage the sole pending action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems field.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LARSEN, JEFFREY R | 1 | 39.5% | +38.1% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18848050 | MONOCOQUE VEHICLE, STRUCTURED BATTERY AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURE | LARSEN, JEFFREY R | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18848050 | MONOCOQUE VEHICLE, STRUCTURED BATTERY AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURE | LARSEN, JEFFREY R | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3612 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18848050 | MONOCOQUE VEHICLE, STRUCTURED BATTERY AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURE | LARSEN, JEFFREY R | 3612 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 17, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialThe Structural Battery Company Ltd. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Jeffrey R Larsen has the most, with 1 of The Structural Battery Company Ltd.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
