Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

The Sydney Children's Hospitals Network

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

The Sydney Children's Hospitals Network is managing 2 pending office actions in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. These actions are being handled by 2 distinct examiners. The prosecution is split across 2 distinct art units, indicating that the company's active matters are being reviewed in different technical contexts within the patent office. This distribution shows that the company is pursuing at least two different technical paths simultaneously.

LEONARD, ARTHUR S is the busiest examiner for the company, with 1 busiest examiner pending action. Since there are 2 pending office actions and 2 distinct examiners, each examiner is responsible for 1 matter. This 1-to-1 ratio between actions and examiners across 2 distinct art units shows a balanced distribution of the current workload. The involvement of 2 distinct examiners in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals sector suggests independent prosecution timelines for each matter.

Practitioners should expect potentially different examination hurdles for each of the 2 pending office actions. The lack of overlap in examiners or art units means that the outcomes of these actions may be independent of one another. This structure requires the company to manage two separate administrative tracks within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals area, each with its own set of prior art and procedural requirements.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LEONARD, ARTHUR S 1 50.5% +50.4%
SABOUR, GHAZAL 1 34.2% +35.0%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17319986 METHODS OF IDENTIFYING GENETIC VARIANTS SABOUR, GHAZAL 26d
18417702 TREATMENT OF COMPLEMENT-MEDIATED DISORDERS LEONARD, ARTHUR S —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17319986 METHODS OF IDENTIFYING GENETIC VARIANTS SABOUR, GHAZAL 26d
18417702 TREATMENT OF COMPLEMENT-MEDIATED DISORDERS LEONARD, ARTHUR S —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1631 1
1686 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18417702 TREATMENT OF COMPLEMENT-MEDIATED DISORDERS LEONARD, ARTHUR S 1631 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 19, 2024
17319986 METHODS OF IDENTIFYING GENETIC VARIANTS SABOUR, GHAZAL 1686 §101 Non-Final OA 26d Pending May 13, 2021

Managing The Sydney Children's Hospitals Network's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does The Sydney Children's Hospitals Network have?

The Sydney Children's Hospitals Network has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most The Sydney Children's Hospitals Network applications?

Arthur S Leonard has the most, with 1 of The Sydney Children's Hospitals Network's pending office actions.

What technology area are The Sydney Children's Hospitals Network's patent applications in?

Mostly Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals (USPTO Tech Center 1600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month