Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

The University of Manchester

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

12 pending office actions • 12 art units • 12 examiners • 0 of 12 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

The University of Manchester has 13 pending office actions in Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals. The matters are distributed across 13 examiners and 13 art units, indicating a separate examiner and art-unit path for each pending matter. This structure limits the value of a single examiner-focused strategy and calls for matter-level prosecution tracking.

HILTUNEN, THOMAS J is the busiest examiner, with 1 pending matter. That figure matches the assignment shown across the examiner set, so no examiner controls a larger portion of the portfolio. Counsel should maintain consistency in technical positions while tailoring each response to its own examination record.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

12
Total Pending OAs
7
Non-Final OAs
5
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

7
Hard (58%)
3
Medium (25%)
2
Easy (17%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other2 (17%)
§103 only1 (8%)
§102 only1 (8%)
§112 only1 (8%)
Double-patenting only1 (8%)
Double-patenting + other1 (8%)
Multi-statute (no §101)5 (42%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

11
Life Sciences
92% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
8% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

120 h
Manual time on pending OAs
24 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
42 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HILTUNEN, THOMAS J 1 81.5% +6.0%
SWIER, WAYNE K. 1 67.9% +19.2%
MENON, KRISHNAN S 1 59.7% +11.3%
PAK, YONG D 1 74.7% +14.2%
CRAIG, KAILA ANGELIQUE 1 33.8% +25.2%
NIEBAUER, RONALD T 1 40.8% +34.0%
EIX, EMILY FAY 1 45.7% +76.0%
PIPIC, ALMA 1 54.8% +54.3%
SCHACHERMEYER, SAMANTHA LYNN 1 35.7% +70.8%
LIPPOLIS, ALEXANDRA ROSE 1 47.2% +63.6%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18996676 GATE DRIVE CIRCUIT FOR A POWER INVERTER LEG IN A POWER INVERTER, POWER INVERTER AND METHODS OF OPERATION THEREOF HILTUNEN, THOMAS J —

Hard Cases (7)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18277434 ADAMTS13 VARIANT EIX, EMILY FAY 34d
18856983 PROCESS AND DEVICE FOR ASSEMBLY OF VAN DER WAALS HETEROSTRUCTURES SWIER, WAYNE K. —
18837581 Method and Apparatus for Mineral Extraction MENON, KRISHNAN S —
18292634 FUNCTIONALISATION OF CARBOXYMETHYLCELLULOSE CRAIG, KAILA ANGELIQUE —
18573067 Antimicrobial Peptides and Their Use NIEBAUER, RONALD T —
18269147 HYALURONAN IS A DRIVER OF COVID-19 SEVERITY SCHACHERMEYER, SAMANTHA LYNN —
17754721 MODULATING OPSIN SIGNALING LIFETIME FOR OPTOGENETIC APPLICATIONS LIPPOLIS, ALEXANDRA ROSE —

Interview Candidates (9)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17926847 ANTIVIRAL POLYMERS PIPIC, ALMA 25d overdue
18277434 ADAMTS13 VARIANT EIX, EMILY FAY 34d
18856983 PROCESS AND DEVICE FOR ASSEMBLY OF VAN DER WAALS HETEROSTRUCTURES SWIER, WAYNE K. —
18837581 Method and Apparatus for Mineral Extraction MENON, KRISHNAN S —
18706219 ERROR PRONE DNA POLYMERASE FOR ORGANELLE MUTATION PAK, YONG D —
18292634 FUNCTIONALISATION OF CARBOXYMETHYLCELLULOSE CRAIG, KAILA ANGELIQUE —
18573067 Antimicrobial Peptides and Their Use NIEBAUER, RONALD T —
18269147 HYALURONAN IS A DRIVER OF COVID-19 SEVERITY SCHACHERMEYER, SAMANTHA LYNN —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2836 1
1748 1
1771 1
1652 1
1618 1
1658 1
1653 1
1617 1
1693 1
1637 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18996676 GATE DRIVE CIRCUIT FOR A POWER INVERTER LEG IN A POWER INVERTER, POWER INVERTER AND METHODS OF OPERATION THEREOF HILTUNEN, THOMAS J 2836 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 17, 2025
18856983 PROCESS AND DEVICE FOR ASSEMBLY OF VAN DER WAALS HETEROSTRUCTURES SWIER, WAYNE K. 1748 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 15, 2024
18837581 Method and Apparatus for Mineral Extraction MENON, KRISHNAN S 1771 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 09, 2024
18706219 ERROR PRONE DNA POLYMERASE FOR ORGANELLE MUTATION PAK, YONG D 1652 §112 Final Rejection — Pending Apr 30, 2024
18292634 FUNCTIONALISATION OF CARBOXYMETHYLCELLULOSE CRAIG, KAILA ANGELIQUE 1618 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 26, 2024
18573067 Antimicrobial Peptides and Their Use NIEBAUER, RONALD T 1658 §101§102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 21, 2023
18277434 ADAMTS13 VARIANT EIX, EMILY FAY 1653 §102§103§112 Final Rejection 34d Pending Aug 16, 2023
17926847 ANTIVIRAL POLYMERS PIPIC, ALMA 1617 §103 Final Rejection 25d overdue Pending Jul 19, 2023
18269147 HYALURONAN IS A DRIVER OF COVID-19 SEVERITY SCHACHERMEYER, SAMANTHA LYNN 1693 §101§102§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 22, 2023
17754721 MODULATING OPSIN SIGNALING LIFETIME FOR OPTOGENETIC APPLICATIONS LIPPOLIS, ALEXANDRA ROSE 1637 §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 21, 2023
18041141 NANOPARTICLE-ENABLED ANALYSIS OF CELL-FREE NUCLEIC ACID IN COMPLEX BIOLOGICAL FLUIDS COUNTS, GARY W 1678 §103§112DP Non-Final OA 67d overdue Pending Feb 09, 2023
18041131 MULTIOMIC ANALYSIS OF NANOPARTICLE-CORONAS KENNEDY, SARAH JANE 1682 DP Final Rejection — Pending Feb 09, 2023

Managing The University of Manchester's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does The University of Manchester have?

The University of Manchester has 12 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 12 art units and 12 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most The University of Manchester applications?

Thomas J Hiltunen has the most, with 1 of The University of Manchester's pending office actions.

What technology area are The University of Manchester's patent applications in?

Mostly Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals (USPTO Tech Center 1600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month