Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

The University of Memphis Research Foundation

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

The University of Memphis Research Foundation maintains a company patent portfolio within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. The data indicates that there are 3 pending office actions currently active. These actions are handled by 3 distinct examiners, ensuring that no two pending matters are under the review of the same individual. This distribution of 3 pending office actions is also reflected in the 3 distinct art units involved in the prosecution.

The busiest examiner for this portfolio is NGUYEN, NAM P, who is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending office action. Since there are 3 distinct examiners for 3 pending office actions, each examiner is currently managing exactly one action. This one to one ratio between actions, examiners, and art units suggests a broad spread of the foundation's biological and pharmaceutical innovations across different USPTO specialties.

For a patent practitioner, this configuration means that the 3 pending office actions will each be subject to the unique standards and examiner preferences of 3 distinct art units. The lack of overlap among the 3 distinct examiners prevents any single person's habits from having a disproportionate impact on the portfolio. Managing these 3 pending office actions requires a versatile strategy that can adapt to three different technical review environments within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals field.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (33%)
2
Medium (67%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (67%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
NGUYEN, NAM P 1 54.8% +48.7%
MCDOWELL, BRIAN E 1 74.0% +31.0%
SCHLIENTZ, LEAH H 1 41.8% +38.7%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
16954112 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR THE DETECTION AND MOLECULAR PROFILING OF MEMBRANE BOUND VESICLES SCHLIENTZ, LEAH H —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17702656 CONTROLLING BIOFILMS WITH CYCLOPROPANATED FATTY ACIDS MCDOWELL, BRIAN E 8d overdue
18132746 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR THE DETECTION AND MOLECULAR PROFILING OF MEMBRANE BOUND VESICLES WITH NANOPARTICLES NGUYEN, NAM P 12d
16954112 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR THE DETECTION AND MOLECULAR PROFILING OF MEMBRANE BOUND VESICLES SCHLIENTZ, LEAH H —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1678 1
1624 1
1618 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18132746 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR THE DETECTION AND MOLECULAR PROFILING OF MEMBRANE BOUND VESICLES WITH NANOPARTICLES NGUYEN, NAM P 1678 §103 Final Rejection 12d Pending Apr 10, 2023
17702656 CONTROLLING BIOFILMS WITH CYCLOPROPANATED FATTY ACIDS MCDOWELL, BRIAN E 1624 §103 Non-Final OA 8d overdue Pending Mar 23, 2022
16954112 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR THE DETECTION AND MOLECULAR PROFILING OF MEMBRANE BOUND VESICLES SCHLIENTZ, LEAH H 1618 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 17, 2020

Managing The University of Memphis Research Foundation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does The University of Memphis Research Foundation have?

The University of Memphis Research Foundation has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 3 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most The University of Memphis Research Foundation applications?

Nam P Nguyen has the most, with 1 of The University of Memphis Research Foundation's pending office actions.

What technology area are The University of Memphis Research Foundation's patent applications in?

Mostly Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals (USPTO Tech Center 1600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month