Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

The University of Memphis

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

The University of Memphis currently manages 1 pending office action within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and is being reviewed within 1 distinct art unit. This indicates that the company's current prosecution activity is concentrated in a technical sector. The presence of the art unit suggests that the technology being patented falls within a specific classification at the patent office. This focus allows the company to direct its legal resources toward the point of contact within the patent office.

The busiest examiner for the company is LEE, JIA-HAI, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. Since this examiner handles the pending matter, they are the individual currently evaluating the company's applications. For a practitioner, this means that the prosecution strategy is dependent on the feedback and requirements of the examiner within their assigned art unit. The lack of multiple pending actions simplifies the administrative tracking of the portfolio, as all communications are centralized. This concentration allows for a focused strategy when addressing the requirements of the art unit involved.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Double-patenting + other1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LEE, JIA-HAI 1 49.0% +47.0%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17230023 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR ENHANCING HEALING AND REGENERATION OF BONE AND SOFT TISSUE LEE, JIA-HAI —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1658 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
17230023 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR ENHANCING HEALING AND REGENERATION OF BONE AND SOFT TISSUE LEE, JIA-HAI 1658 §102§103DP Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 14, 2021

Managing The University of Memphis's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month