Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

The Upside Group Inc.

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Chemistry & Materials

9 pending office actions • 7 art units • 9 examiners • 0 of 9 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

The Upside Group Inc. currently has 9 pending office actions in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This volume of 9 pending office actions indicates a significant level of activity and a wide range of applications under review. For a practitioner, managing 9 pending office actions requires a strategy that can handle multiple simultaneous deadlines while maintaining a unified approach to the Chemistry & Materials subject matter. The concentration in this area defines the technical scope of the current filings.

The workload is distributed among 9 distinct examiners and 7 distinct art units. The busiest examiner, HENSEL, BRENDAN A, is responsible for 1 pending office action. With 9 distinct examiners involved, the portfolio's outcomes are determined by a broad group of individuals rather than a single examiner. The presence of 7 distinct art units suggests that the company's technology is categorized into several different technical niches within the patent office, requiring varied prosecution tactics.

Practitioners should be prepared for a variety of examination styles given the 7 distinct art units involved. Because HENSEL, BRENDAN A is responsible for 1 pending office action, the prosecution strategy must be tailored to the specific preferences of each of the 9 distinct examiners. This distribution ensures that the overall success of the 9 pending office actions is not overly reliant on any one person's discretion. Monitoring the 7 distinct art units will help identify overlapping prior art.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

9
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

8
Hard (89%)
1
Medium (11%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (11%)
§103 only1 (11%)
Multi-statute (no §101)7 (78%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

9
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

90 h
Manual time on pending OAs
18 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
31 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.8 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HENSEL, BRENDAN A 1 66.4% +28.7%
MONTANARI, DAVID A 1 64.8% +49.0%
HASSAN, LIBAN M 1 50.8% +31.1%
PAULUS, ERIN VIRGINIA 1 20.0% +94.1%
SHELLHAMMER, JAMES PAUL 1 10.0% +18.8%
DIVIESTI, KARLA ISOBEL 1 3.2% +16.7%
MCNEIL, JENNIFER C 1 23.7% +20.0%
SCHUBERG, LAURA J 1 23.6% +37.0%
YAMASAKI, ROBERT J 1 67.4% +44.1%

Hard Cases (9)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17658009 GENERATION OF CELL-BASED PRODUCTS FOR CONSUMPTION THAT COMPRISE PROTEINS FROM EXOTIC, ENDANGERED, AND EXTINCT SPECIES YAMASAKI, ROBERT J 49d overdue
18458564 PLANT BASE/ANIMAL CELL HYBRID MEAT SUBSTITUTE SHELLHAMMER, JAMES PAUL 26d
18298019 VACUUM DRYING A COMESTIBLE CELL-BASED MEAT PRODUCT MCNEIL, JENNIFER C 26d
18741412 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR STERILIZING BIOREACTOR SYSTEMS WITH SUPERHEATED WATER HENSEL, BRENDAN A —
18731343 NUTRIENT MEDIA FOR THE PRODUCTION OF SLAUGHTER-FREE MEAT MONTANARI, DAVID A —
18608451 SUBSTRATE APPARATUS WITH MULTI-LAYER SUBSTRATE FOR CELL-BASED MEAT CULTIVATORS HASSAN, LIBAN M —
18544063 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR EXTENDING THE REPLICATIVE CAPACITY OF BOVINE CELLS PAULUS, ERIN VIRGINIA —
18334250 SUSPENSION BASED CHICKEN PRODUCT FORMULATION DIVIESTI, KARLA ISOBEL —

Interview Candidates (9)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17658009 GENERATION OF CELL-BASED PRODUCTS FOR CONSUMPTION THAT COMPRISE PROTEINS FROM EXOTIC, ENDANGERED, AND EXTINCT SPECIES YAMASAKI, ROBERT J 49d overdue
18458564 PLANT BASE/ANIMAL CELL HYBRID MEAT SUBSTITUTE SHELLHAMMER, JAMES PAUL 26d
18298019 VACUUM DRYING A COMESTIBLE CELL-BASED MEAT PRODUCT MCNEIL, JENNIFER C 26d
18741412 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR STERILIZING BIOREACTOR SYSTEMS WITH SUPERHEATED WATER HENSEL, BRENDAN A —
18731343 NUTRIENT MEDIA FOR THE PRODUCTION OF SLAUGHTER-FREE MEAT MONTANARI, DAVID A —
18608451 SUBSTRATE APPARATUS WITH MULTI-LAYER SUBSTRATE FOR CELL-BASED MEAT CULTIVATORS HASSAN, LIBAN M —
18544063 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR EXTENDING THE REPLICATIVE CAPACITY OF BOVINE CELLS PAULUS, ERIN VIRGINIA —
18334250 SUSPENSION BASED CHICKEN PRODUCT FORMULATION DIVIESTI, KARLA ISOBEL —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1631 2
1793 2
1758 1
1632 1
1799 1
1792 1
1657 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18741412 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR STERILIZING BIOREACTOR SYSTEMS WITH SUPERHEATED WATER HENSEL, BRENDAN A 1758 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 12, 2024
18731343 NUTRIENT MEDIA FOR THE PRODUCTION OF SLAUGHTER-FREE MEAT MONTANARI, DAVID A 1632 §101§102§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 02, 2024
18608451 SUBSTRATE APPARATUS WITH MULTI-LAYER SUBSTRATE FOR CELL-BASED MEAT CULTIVATORS HASSAN, LIBAN M 1799 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 18, 2024
18544063 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR EXTENDING THE REPLICATIVE CAPACITY OF BOVINE CELLS PAULUS, ERIN VIRGINIA 1631 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 18, 2023
18458564 PLANT BASE/ANIMAL CELL HYBRID MEAT SUBSTITUTE SHELLHAMMER, JAMES PAUL 1793 §103§112 Final Rejection 26d Pending Aug 30, 2023
18334250 SUSPENSION BASED CHICKEN PRODUCT FORMULATION DIVIESTI, KARLA ISOBEL 1792 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 13, 2023
18298019 VACUUM DRYING A COMESTIBLE CELL-BASED MEAT PRODUCT MCNEIL, JENNIFER C 1793 §103§112 Final Rejection 26d Pending Apr 10, 2023
18146541 METHOD FOR WASHING AND FINISHING A GROWN CELL MASS SCHUBERG, LAURA J 1631 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 27, 2022
17658009 GENERATION OF CELL-BASED PRODUCTS FOR CONSUMPTION THAT COMPRISE PROTEINS FROM EXOTIC, ENDANGERED, AND EXTINCT SPECIES YAMASAKI, ROBERT J 1657 §103§112 Final Rejection 49d overdue Pending Apr 05, 2022

Managing The Upside Group Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does The Upside Group Inc. have?

The Upside Group Inc. has 9 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 7 art units and 9 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most The Upside Group Inc. applications?

Brendan A Hensel has the most, with 1 of The Upside Group Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are The Upside Group Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month