Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

The Water & Carbon Group Pty Ltd.

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

The Water & Carbon Group Pty Ltd. currently faces 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This single action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, KEYWORTH, PETER, who is the busiest examiner with 1 pending action. The activity is confined to 1 distinct art unit, reflecting a very specific technical focus for the company's current patent strategy.

With only 1 pending office action and 1 distinct examiner, the prosecution strategy is entirely dependent on the review by KEYWORTH, PETER. The involvement of 1 distinct art unit suggests that the subject matter is clearly categorized within the patent office's system. This singular engagement allows for a highly focused approach to resolving the outstanding office action, as there are no competing priorities or different examiner styles to balance. Practitioners should focus on the specific technical arguments that resonate with this single examiner to move the application toward allowance.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KEYWORTH, PETER 1 58.3% +23.9%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19054835 THE CONTROL OF CONTINUOUS WATER TREATMENT KEYWORTH, PETER 8d overdue

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1777 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19054835 THE CONTROL OF CONTINUOUS WATER TREATMENT KEYWORTH, PETER 1777 §103 Final Rejection 8d overdue Pending Feb 15, 2025

Managing The Water & Carbon Group Pty Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month