Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
5 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 1 of 5 (20%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 4 (80%) |
| §102 only | 1 (20%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LEWIS, CAMRYN BROOKE | 4 | 0.0% | +0.0% |
| VAUGHN, ALEXANDER JOSEPH | 1 | 80.0% | +21.1% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18294089 | ANALYSIS OF VIDEO DATA FOR ADDRESSING TIME SENSITIVE SITUATIONS IN SURGICAL PROCEDURES | VAUGHN, ALEXANDER JOSEPH | 9d |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18316031 | SURGICAL VIDEO ANALYSIS TO SUPPORT INSURANCE REIMBURSEMENT | LEWIS, CAMRYN BROOKE | 23d overdue |
| 18316059 | CORRELATING A MEDICAL MALPRACTICE CLAIM WITH A PORTION OF A VIDEO | LEWIS, CAMRYN BROOKE | 22d overdue |
| 18316061 | SURGICAL VIDEO ANALYSIS FOR INSURANCE PREMIUM ADJUSTMENT | LEWIS, CAMRYN BROOKE | 22d overdue |
| 18316079 | CORRELATING A MEDICAL CLAIM CODE WITH A PORTION OF A VIDEO | LEWIS, CAMRYN BROOKE | 19d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18294089 | ANALYSIS OF VIDEO DATA FOR ADDRESSING TIME SENSITIVE SITUATIONS IN SURGICAL PROCEDURES | VAUGHN, ALEXANDER JOSEPH | 9d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3683 | 4 |
| 2675 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18294089 | ANALYSIS OF VIDEO DATA FOR ADDRESSING TIME SENSITIVE SITUATIONS IN SURGICAL PROCEDURES | VAUGHN, ALEXANDER JOSEPH | 2675 | §102 | Non-Final OA | 9d | AI Ready | Jan 31, 2024 |
| 18316059 | CORRELATING A MEDICAL MALPRACTICE CLAIM WITH A PORTION OF A VIDEO | LEWIS, CAMRYN BROOKE | 3683 | §101 | Final Rejection | 22d overdue | Pending | May 11, 2023 |
| 18316031 | SURGICAL VIDEO ANALYSIS TO SUPPORT INSURANCE REIMBURSEMENT | LEWIS, CAMRYN BROOKE | 3683 | §101 | Final Rejection | 23d overdue | Pending | May 11, 2023 |
| 18316061 | SURGICAL VIDEO ANALYSIS FOR INSURANCE PREMIUM ADJUSTMENT | LEWIS, CAMRYN BROOKE | 3683 | §101 | Final Rejection | 22d overdue | Pending | May 11, 2023 |
| 18316079 | CORRELATING A MEDICAL CLAIM CODE WITH A PORTION OF A VIDEO | LEWIS, CAMRYN BROOKE | 3683 | §101 | Final Rejection | 19d overdue | Pending | May 11, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial