Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Therabody Inc.

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

8 pending office actions • 5 art units • 7 examiners • 0 of 8 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 36 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Therabody Inc. has 8 pending office actions in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These actions are distributed among 7 distinct examiners. This ratio shows that while most of the 8 pending actions are handled by different individuals, one examiner is responsible for more than one case. This distribution suggests that the company's medical device innovations are being reviewed by a broad group of examiners, each bringing their own perspective to the technical merits of the applications.

The portfolio is active in 5 distinct art units. With 8 pending office actions, the company's work is concentrated within 5 specialized divisions of the patent office. This focus in 5 art units may provide a more consistent examination environment for the company's medical device and mechanical filings. The ratio of 8 actions to 5 art units indicates that the company's technology is concentrated within specific technical silos, potentially leading to more specialized and predictable outcomes within those groups.

CHRISTOPHER E MILLER is the busiest examiner for the company, currently managing 2 pending office actions. This workload of 2 actions is the highest among the 7 distinct examiners. The presence of 8 pending actions across 5 art units highlights the company's current patent prosecution activity. Managing these 8 pending matters across 7 examiners and 5 art units requires a strategic approach to ensure that the company's intellectual property goals are achieved across its medical and mechanical engineering portfolio.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

8
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (38%)
5
Medium (62%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (12%)
§103 only2 (25%)
Double-patenting + other3 (38%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
12% of docket
6
Mechanical / Eng
75% of docket
1
Business / Other
12% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

80 h
Manual time on pending OAs
16 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
28 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MILLER, CHRISTOPHER E 2 46.5% +54.6%
XU, JUSTIN 1 60.2% +36.7%
MAY, ROBERT J 1 75.4% +15.5%
PAHAKIS, MANOLIS Y 1 69.9% +48.0%
HOLCOMB, MARK 1 33.5% +40.4%
STUART, COLIN W 1 57.9% +55.2%
MUTCHLER, CHRISTOPHER JOHN 1 55.9% +20.4%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19272856 ARTICLES OF FOOTWEAR HAVING THERAPEUTIC ASSEMBLIES MAY, ROBERT J 19d overdue
19295322 PERCUSSIVE THERAPY DEVICE WITH ELECTRICALLY CONNECTED ATTACHMENT MILLER, CHRISTOPHER E 13d
17929939 INTELLIGENCE ENGINE SYSTEM AND METHOD HOLCOMB, MARK —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19272856 ARTICLES OF FOOTWEAR HAVING THERAPEUTIC ASSEMBLIES MAY, ROBERT J 19d overdue
19295322 PERCUSSIVE THERAPY DEVICE WITH ELECTRICALLY CONNECTED ATTACHMENT MILLER, CHRISTOPHER E 13d
18175228 COMPACT MUSCLE STIMULATOR PAHAKIS, MANOLIS Y 77d
19421562 WEARABLE DEVICES AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING THERAPY TO A USER AND/OR FOR MEASURING PHYSIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS OF THE USER XU, JUSTIN —
18739019 THERAPY SYSTEM AND DEVICE MILLER, CHRISTOPHER E —
17929939 INTELLIGENCE ENGINE SYSTEM AND METHOD HOLCOMB, MARK —
17828290 VIBRATING GARMENT ASSEMBLY INCLUDING LINEAR MOTORS STUART, COLIN W —
17424706 Electrical Muscle Stimulation Devices, Systems, and Methods MUTCHLER, CHRISTOPHER JOHN —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3785 2
3796 2
3791 1
2875 1
3685 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19421562 WEARABLE DEVICES AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING THERAPY TO A USER AND/OR FOR MEASURING PHYSIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS OF THE USER XU, JUSTIN 3791 §103DP Final Rejection — Pending Dec 16, 2025
19295322 PERCUSSIVE THERAPY DEVICE WITH ELECTRICALLY CONNECTED ATTACHMENT MILLER, CHRISTOPHER E 3785 §103§112 Non-Final OA 13d Pending Aug 08, 2025
19272856 ARTICLES OF FOOTWEAR HAVING THERAPEUTIC ASSEMBLIES MAY, ROBERT J 2875 §102§103 Non-Final OA 19d overdue Pending Jul 17, 2025
18739019 THERAPY SYSTEM AND DEVICE MILLER, CHRISTOPHER E — §103§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 10, 2024
18175228 COMPACT MUSCLE STIMULATOR PAHAKIS, MANOLIS Y 3796 §102§103DP Final Rejection 77d Pending Feb 27, 2023
17929939 INTELLIGENCE ENGINE SYSTEM AND METHOD HOLCOMB, MARK 3685 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 06, 2022
17828290 VIBRATING GARMENT ASSEMBLY INCLUDING LINEAR MOTORS STUART, COLIN W 3785 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 31, 2022
17424706 Electrical Muscle Stimulation Devices, Systems, and Methods MUTCHLER, CHRISTOPHER JOHN 3796 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 21, 2021

Managing Therabody Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month