Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Theragenics Corporation currently has 2 pending office actions in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. While there are 2 distinct examiners involved, all active prosecution is concentrated within 1 distinct art unit. JONGHWAN NMN BAEK is the busiest examiner, managing 1 pending office action. This structure indicates that while the technical subject matter is consistent enough to remain within a single art unit, the USPTO has assigned the cases to different individuals for review, which may lead to different interpretive styles.
The use of 1 distinct art unit for 2 pending office actions suggests a consistent administrative environment. This allows the applicant to apply a unified understanding of art unit policies while tailoring specific technical arguments to the 2 distinct examiners. Since JONGHWAN NMN BAEK and the other examiner each handle 1 pending office action, the workload is evenly distributed. Practitioners should look for commonalities in the 2 pending office actions that might allow for shared research or consistent claim strategies. However, they must remain sensitive to the fact that 2 distinct examiners may reach different conclusions on similar technical points within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals field.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BAEK, JONGHWAN NMN | 1 | 60.0% | +0.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18335342 | PHOTOCURABLE COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR DELIVERING RADIATION TO A SUBJECT | BAEK, JONGHWAN NMN | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1618 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18335342 | PHOTOCURABLE COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR DELIVERING RADIATION TO A SUBJECT | BAEK, JONGHWAN NMN | 1618 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 15, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial