Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Theriva Biologics, Inc.

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Theriva Biologics, Inc. is currently managing 3 pending office actions within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. These actions are assigned to 3 distinct examiners, ensuring that no two pending matters are being reviewed by the same person. Furthermore, the workload is spread across 3 distinct art units, which suggests a high degree of technical specialization for each individual application.

DAVIS, RUTH A is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, holding 1 pending action. With a busiest examiner pending count of 1 and a total of 3 pending office actions, the company's prosecution efforts are distributed across the distinct examiners. This structure means that the company's overall success is not tied to the discretion of a single examiner. Instead, the 3 pending office actions are subject to the independent standards of the distinct art units. Practitioners should be prepared to tailor their arguments to the specific requirements of each of the 3 distinct examiners involved.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (67%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
DAVIS, RUTH A 1 60.8% +31.1%
IANNUZO, NATALIE NMN 1 12.5% +71.4%
DURYEE, ALEXANDER MARSH 1 33.3% +41.6%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18563277 ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE-BASED TREATMENTS OF CELIAC DISEASE DAVIS, RUTH A 22d overdue
17725692 ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE AGENTS FOR TREATMENT OF NEURODEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS IANNUZO, NATALIE NMN —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18563277 ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE-BASED TREATMENTS OF CELIAC DISEASE DAVIS, RUTH A 22d overdue
17725692 ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE AGENTS FOR TREATMENT OF NEURODEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS IANNUZO, NATALIE NMN —
17626932 INTESTINAL ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE-BASED TREATMENTS OF METABOLIC DISORDERS DURYEE, ALEXANDER MARSH —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1699 1
1653 1
1657 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18563277 ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE-BASED TREATMENTS OF CELIAC DISEASE DAVIS, RUTH A 1699 §103§112Other Final Rejection 22d overdue Pending Nov 21, 2023
17725692 ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE AGENTS FOR TREATMENT OF NEURODEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS IANNUZO, NATALIE NMN 1653 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 21, 2022
17626932 INTESTINAL ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE-BASED TREATMENTS OF METABOLIC DISORDERS DURYEE, ALEXANDER MARSH 1657 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 13, 2022

Managing Theriva Biologics, Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month