Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Computing & Software
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Thesee is currently managing 1 pending office action in the Computing & Software technology area. This activity is localized in 1 distinct art unit, which is typical for companies focusing on specific software or algorithmic innovations. The concentration within the Computing & Software technology area indicates that the company's current intellectual property strategy is focused on its computing assets. By working within 1 distinct art unit, the company can ensure its prosecution tactics are consistent with the specific software examination policies of that group.
The examination of the pending matter is handled by 1 distinct examiner, HU, JENSEN. As the busiest examiner for the company, HU, JENSEN is currently reviewing 1 pending office action. With only HU, JENSEN and the specified art unit involved, the company's prosecution path is very direct. The success of the current portfolio depends on successfully navigating the specific examination criteria of the examiner within the computing and software domain. This arrangement means that the company's entire pending workload is subject to the review of 1 distinct examiner, allowing for a focused dialogue between the applicant and the patent office.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| HU, JENSEN | 1 | 68.1% | +26.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18996890 | IMPROVED ONLINE SCORING | HU, JENSEN | 27d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18996890 | IMPROVED ONLINE SCORING | HU, JENSEN | 27d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2169 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18996890 | IMPROVED ONLINE SCORING | HU, JENSEN | 2169 | §101§102§103 | Non-Final OA | 27d | Pending | Jan 17, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial