Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Communications
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Thrugreen LLC is navigating 1 pending office action in the Communications technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, PREVIL, DANIEL. As the busiest examiner with 1 pending action, PREVIL, DANIEL is responsible for the entirety of the company's current pending workload.
The portfolio's focus is narrow, as evidenced by the use of 1 distinct art unit for this single action. With 1 pending office action, the company's immediate progress in the communications sector is tied to the examination of this specific application. Practitioners should focus on the examiner's specific feedback to advance the portfolio toward allowance.
The alignment of 1 distinct examiner with 1 distinct art unit suggests a specialized review process. For the legal team, this means that the outcome of the 1 pending office action will be determined by a single set of departmental standards. Effective communication with PREVIL, DANIEL is the primary factor in securing these communications-related claims and ensuring the growth of the company's intellectual property.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| No statute on record | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| PREVIL, DANIEL | 1 | 85.9% | +12.5% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18962512 | PROBABILISTICALLY ADAPTIVE TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | PREVIL, DANIEL | 30d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2685 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18962512 | PROBABILISTICALLY ADAPTIVE TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | PREVIL, DANIEL | 2685 | Other | Non-Final OA | 30d | Pending | Nov 27, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial