Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days
Tigo Energy, Inc. has a company patent portfolio that is active in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. There is currently 1 pending office action for this portfolio. This matter is being reviewed by a distinct examiner within 1 distinct art unit. The concentration of the workload in a distinct art unit suggests a focused technical application within the broader chemistry and materials field.
The busiest examiner for Tigo Energy, Inc. is MALLEY JR., DANIEL PATRICK, who is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending action. Practitioners managing this portfolio are dealing with a point of contact at the patent office. The outcome of the current prosecution is dependent on the decisions made by this examiner. With only a distinct examiner and art unit involved, the prosecution environment is highly specific. This requires a targeted approach to address the examiner's specific concerns to resolve the pending office action.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MALLEY JR., DANIEL PATRICK | 1 | 56.5% | +45.7% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18620472 | LOCATION DETERMINATION IN A PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEM | MALLEY JR., DANIEL PATRICK | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18620472 | LOCATION DETERMINATION IN A PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEM | MALLEY JR., DANIEL PATRICK | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1726 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18620472 | LOCATION DETERMINATION IN A PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEM | MALLEY JR., DANIEL PATRICK | 1726 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 28, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial