Technology area: Communications
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Tmaxtibero Co. Ltd. is currently addressing 1 pending office action in the Communications technology area. This single matter is being reviewed by 1 distinct examiner, OPSASNICK, MICHAEL N, who is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending action. The portfolio's current activity is limited to 1 distinct art unit, reflecting a narrow technical scope. With 1 pending office action, the company's current prosecution efforts are highly concentrated.
OPSASNICK, MICHAEL N is the sole examiner involved, so the prosecution strategy must be tailored to his individual examination approach. The 1 distinct art unit involved indicates that the company's Communications claims are being evaluated by a single specialized group at the USPTO. This allows the company to focus its resources on the 1 busiest examiner pending action without the need to coordinate across different technical departments. Practitioners can focus on the specific technical standards of the 1 distinct art unit to advance the company's intellectual property goals in the Communications field.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| OPSASNICK, MICHAEL N | 1 | 81.9% | +10.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17697781 | Techniques For Performing Subject Word Classification Of Document Data | OPSASNICK, MICHAEL N | 72d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17697781 | Techniques For Performing Subject Word Classification Of Document Data | OPSASNICK, MICHAEL N | 72d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2658 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17697781 | Techniques For Performing Subject Word Classification Of Document Data | OPSASNICK, MICHAEL N | 2658 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | 72d | Pending | Mar 17, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialTmaxtibero Co. Ltd. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Michael N Opsasnick has the most, with 1 of Tmaxtibero Co. Ltd.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Communications (USPTO Tech Center 2600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
