Technology area: Computing & Software
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 5 patents granted in the last 365 days
Togal AI Inc. currently has 1 pending office action within the Computing & Software technology area. This single action is being handled by 1 distinct examiner, DEBNATH, NUPUR, who is also the busiest examiner with 1 busiest examiner pending action. The prosecution is localized within 1 distinct art unit, reflecting a specific technical focus for this particular matter.
With only 1 pending office action, the portfolio's current activity is entirely dependent on the interaction with DEBNATH, NUPUR. The presence of 1 distinct art unit suggests that the software-related claims are being evaluated within a specific niche of the Computing & Software sector. For a portfolio of this size, having 1 pending office action assigned to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit means there is no diversification of examiner perspectives at this time. The outcome of this 1 pending office action will define the current success rate for Togal AI Inc. in this technology area.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| DEBNATH, NUPUR | 1 | 64.4% | +36.8% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19288212 | AI-ASSISTED SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MANAGING AND EXECUTING CHANGE ORDERS IN BUILDING DESIGN PLANS | DEBNATH, NUPUR | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2186 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19288212 | AI-ASSISTED SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MANAGING AND EXECUTING CHANGE ORDERS IN BUILDING DESIGN PLANS | DEBNATH, NUPUR | 2186 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 01, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial