Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Toivoa Inc. currently faces 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The company's prosecution activity involves a distinct examiner and is contained within a distinct art unit. This distribution shows a singular point of contact and a focused technical classification for its current pending matters.
NG, JONATHAN K is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, currently overseeing 1 pending office action. This action constitutes the entirety of the company's pending workload at the patent office. The alignment of pending activity with a distinct examiner suggests a specific prosecution path for the company's innovations in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems space.
Practitioners observing this portfolio can see that the distinct art unit involved represents the full scope of current examiner scrutiny. The lack of broader distribution across multiple units or examiners simplifies the tracking of the company's immediate patenting objectives. This concentration allows for a clear focus on the specific examiner's tendencies and historical allowance rates. A single pending matter in this diverse technology area indicates a very targeted approach to intellectual property protection.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| NG, JONATHAN K | 1 | 35.6% | +14.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18118482 | Therapeutics Platform for Mental Health Therapy for People with Disabilities | NG, JONATHAN K | 45d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18118482 | Therapeutics Platform for Mental Health Therapy for People with Disabilities | NG, JONATHAN K | 45d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3619 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18118482 | Therapeutics Platform for Mental Health Therapy for People with Disabilities | NG, JONATHAN K | 3619 | §101§103§112 | Final Rejection | 45d overdue | Pending | Mar 07, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial