Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026

Tokamak Energy Ltd

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

5 pending office actions • 5 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 10 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Tokamak Energy Ltd has 5 pending office actions distributed across the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The prosecution workload is spread among 5 distinct examiners and 5 distinct art units, indicating a distribution of subject matter within this technical field. AZAM, MUHAMMED is identified as the busiest examiner for the portfolio. Despite this designation, this examiner is currently handling 1 pending office action.

The parity between the 5 pending office actions and the 5 distinct examiners suggests that each matter is being reviewed by a different official. This 1 to 1 ratio between actions and examiners, as well as the 5 distinct art units involved, shows no overlap in the personnel or units reviewing the company's Chemistry & Materials applications. AZAM, MUHAMMED is the busiest examiner with 1 pending office action, which is the same count as every other examiner in the portfolio. This lack of concentration across the 5 distinct art units suggests that the company's current filings cover a range of chemical or material sub-specialties. Practitioners can observe that the 5 pending actions are being prosecuted independently across 5 different examiners.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
3
Medium (60%)
2
Easy (40%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only3 (60%)
§112 only2 (40%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
40% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
20% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
40% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
AZAM, MUHAMMED 1 86.8% +11.1%
FINK, THOMAS ANDREW 1 65.0% +32.6%
TRAN, MINH 1 86.3% +15.9%
LIANG, ANTHONY M 1 83.7% +9.2%
SIDDIQUI, ADIL ABDUL WAJID 1 55.2% +12.2%

Quick Wins (3)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18893688 FLEXIBLE HTS CURRENT LEADS AZAM, MUHAMMED —
18707522 PASSIVE COOLANT MANAGEMENT TRAN, MINH —
18555641 ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING OF COMPLEX METAL STRUCTURES LIANG, ANTHONY M —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18893688 FLEXIBLE HTS CURRENT LEADS AZAM, MUHAMMED —
18728477 EVAPORATION PUMP FINK, THOMAS ANDREW —
18707522 PASSIVE COOLANT MANAGEMENT TRAN, MINH —
18555695 GRADED INTERLAYER SIDDIQUI, ADIL ABDUL WAJID —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2847 1
3746 1
3646 1
1734 1
1735 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18893688 FLEXIBLE HTS CURRENT LEADS AZAM, MUHAMMED 2847 §103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 04, 2024
18728477 EVAPORATION PUMP FINK, THOMAS ANDREW 3746 §112 Final Rejection — Pending Jul 12, 2024
18707522 PASSIVE COOLANT MANAGEMENT TRAN, MINH 3646 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 03, 2024
18555641 ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING OF COMPLEX METAL STRUCTURES LIANG, ANTHONY M 1734 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 16, 2023
18555695 GRADED INTERLAYER SIDDIQUI, ADIL ABDUL WAJID 1735 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 16, 2023

Managing Tokamak Energy Ltd's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Tokamak Energy Ltd have?

Tokamak Energy Ltd has 5 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 5 art units and 5 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Tokamak Energy Ltd applications?

Muhammed Azam has the most, with 1 of Tokamak Energy Ltd's pending office actions.

What technology area are Tokamak Energy Ltd's patent applications in?

Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month