Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Computing & Software
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Tokyo Tech Engineering Solutions Inc. has 1 pending office action in the Computing & Software technology area. This matter is being handled by 1 distinct examiner in 1 distinct art unit. Such a focused prosecution profile suggests that the company's current legal efforts are directed at a specific software or computing advancement. The lack of diversity in examiners indicates that the company is not currently managing a broad range of simultaneous patent challenges.
ANTHONY RAY CHAVEZ is the busiest examiner, with 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This 1 action represents the total volume of pending office actions for the portfolio. With only 1 distinct examiner to interface with, the company can focus its resources on addressing the specific concerns raised in this office action. The alignment of 1 distinct examiner with 1 distinct art unit allows for a highly targeted prosecution strategy. Practitioners should focus on the specific requirements of this 1 distinct art unit to ensure a successful outcome for the pending matter.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| CHAVEZ, ANTHONY RAY | 1 | 7.7% | +46.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17629806 | SYSTEM, METHOD, PROGRAM, AND RECORDING MEDIUM FOR ESTIMATING DISPLACEMENT OF LONG STRUCTURE | CHAVEZ, ANTHONY RAY | 34d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17629806 | SYSTEM, METHOD, PROGRAM, AND RECORDING MEDIUM FOR ESTIMATING DISPLACEMENT OF LONG STRUCTURE | CHAVEZ, ANTHONY RAY | 34d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2186 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17629806 | SYSTEM, METHOD, PROGRAM, AND RECORDING MEDIUM FOR ESTIMATING DISPLACEMENT OF LONG STRUCTURE | CHAVEZ, ANTHONY RAY | 2186 | §101§103 | Final Rejection | 34d | Pending | Jan 25, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial