Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Tony Waygong Chiu is currently managing 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, JASON S MORROW, who is the busiest examiner for this profile with 1 pending action. The prosecution is concentrated within 1 distinct art unit, indicating a specific technical focus for the current filing. This allows the applicant to focus resources on the examiner relationship and the art unit guidelines.
With only 1 pending office action, the administrative burden of this portfolio is limited. The use of 1 distinct examiner for the case means that the prosecution strategy is dependent on the interaction with JASON S MORROW. This focus within 1 distinct art unit allows for a tailored approach to the pending matter. Because the 1 pending action of the busiest examiner represents the entire active docket, the applicant can dedicate attention to the specific technical requirements of the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems field.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MORROW, JASON S | 1 | 84.3% | +10.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19211333 | HARD FOLDING CAR COVER | MORROW, JASON S | 139d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19211333 | HARD FOLDING CAR COVER | MORROW, JASON S | 139d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3612 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19211333 | HARD FOLDING CAR COVER | MORROW, JASON S | 3612 | §101§112 | Final Rejection | 139d overdue | Pending | May 19, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial