Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Networking & Security
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Tooth Care Project Ltd. is active in the Networking & Security technology area with 1 pending office action currently under review. This single action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, KHALID, OMER, who is also the busiest examiner for the portfolio with 1 pending case. The prosecution is localized within 1 distinct art unit, reflecting a specific technical focus within the networking domain.
The presence of 1 pending office action across 1 distinct art unit and 1 distinct examiner indicates a very narrow prosecution pipeline. For a company in Networking & Security, this suggests that current patent office interactions are limited to a single specific invention or application. Practitioners managing this portfolio have a singular point of contact in KHALID, OMER, and do not need to coordinate across multiple art units. The entirety of the company's active examination is represented by this 1 pending case, making the resolution of this office action the primary focus of their current intellectual property strategy.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| KHALID, OMER | 1 | 66.7% | +23.1% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19099113 | Remote Event Monitoring System and Method | KHALID, OMER | 41d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19099113 | Remote Event Monitoring System and Method | KHALID, OMER | 41d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2422 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19099113 | Remote Event Monitoring System and Method | KHALID, OMER | 2422 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | 41d | Pending | Jan 28, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial