Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Communications • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics
3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days
Tooz Technologies GmbH has 3 pending office actions in the Communications technology area. These 3 actions are distributed across 3 distinct art units, showing that each pending matter is classified in a different technical category. This suggests a varied focus within the company's communications-related filings. The alignment of 3 pending office actions with 3 distinct art units indicates a lack of concentration in the prosecution process.
The portfolio is being reviewed by 3 distinct examiners, which matches the total number of 3 pending office actions. RAYAN, MIHIR K is the busiest examiner for the company, with 1 pending office action currently assigned. With 3 distinct examiners for 3 actions, every pending matter is being handled by a unique individual. This means that RAYAN, MIHIR K and the other examiners each manage exactly 1 pending office action.
Practitioners must navigate 3 different examination environments for these 3 pending office actions. The data shows that no single examiner manages more than one active matter for the company. This requires a strategy that addresses the specific requirements of 3 distinct art units and 3 separate examiner relationships. The outcome of the 3 pending office actions will depend on these individual examination experiences in the Communications area.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (33%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 2 (67%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| RAYAN, MIHIR K | 1 | 84.9% | +10.6% |
| LEI, JIE | 1 | 73.1% | +16.8% |
| KHARE, ATUL P | 1 | 54.8% | +72.3% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19160430 | DISPLAY DEVICE HAVING A HOLDING DEVICE WHICH CAN BE PLACED ON THE HEAD OF A USER | RAYAN, MIHIR K | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19101248 | SPECTACLE LENS FOR A DISPLAY DEVICE WHICH CAN BE PLACED ON THE HEAD OF A USER AND WHICH GENERATES AN IMAGE, AND DISPLAY DEVICE COMPRISING SUCH A SPECTACLE LENS | LEI, JIE | — |
| 18846617 | METHOD FOR PRODUCING A PLASTIC MOLDING | KHARE, ATUL P | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19160430 | DISPLAY DEVICE HAVING A HOLDING DEVICE WHICH CAN BE PLACED ON THE HEAD OF A USER | RAYAN, MIHIR K | — |
| 19101248 | SPECTACLE LENS FOR A DISPLAY DEVICE WHICH CAN BE PLACED ON THE HEAD OF A USER AND WHICH GENERATES AN IMAGE, AND DISPLAY DEVICE COMPRISING SUCH A SPECTACLE LENS | LEI, JIE | — |
| 18846617 | METHOD FOR PRODUCING A PLASTIC MOLDING | KHARE, ATUL P | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2622 | 1 |
| 2872 | 1 |
| 1742 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19160430 | DISPLAY DEVICE HAVING A HOLDING DEVICE WHICH CAN BE PLACED ON THE HEAD OF A USER | RAYAN, MIHIR K | 2622 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 27, 2025 |
| 19101248 | SPECTACLE LENS FOR A DISPLAY DEVICE WHICH CAN BE PLACED ON THE HEAD OF A USER AND WHICH GENERATES AN IMAGE, AND DISPLAY DEVICE COMPRISING SUCH A SPECTACLE LENS | LEI, JIE | 2872 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Feb 04, 2025 |
| 18846617 | METHOD FOR PRODUCING A PLASTIC MOLDING | KHARE, ATUL P | 1742 | §102§103§112Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 12, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialTooz Technologies GmbH has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 3 examiners.
Mihir K Rayan has the most, with 1 of Tooz Technologies GmbH's pending office actions.
Mostly Communications (USPTO Tech Center 2600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
