Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
4 pending office actions • 0 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 5 patents granted in the last 365 days
Topgolf Sweden AB is currently managing 4 pending office actions. These 4 pending office actions are handled by 4 distinct examiners, indicating that no two active cases are being reviewed by the same individual. The data shows 0 distinct art units, which may reflect a specific stage of the filing process or a unique classification for these cases. This lack of art unit diversity suggests that the company's current prosecution is not yet spread across multiple technical divisions of the patent office.
WU, JERRY is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, currently overseeing 1 busiest examiner pending action. Since there are 4 distinct examiners for the 4 pending office actions, the workload is evenly distributed across the patent office staff. This decentralized approach means the company's immediate prosecution results are tied to the individual decisions of 4 different examiners. For the practitioner, this distribution between 4 pending office actions and 4 distinct examiners requires a strategy that addresses four unique examination styles simultaneously, including the 1 busiest examiner pending action managed by WU, JERRY.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (25%) |
| §102 only | 1 (25%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 2 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| WU, JERRY | 1 | 68.6% | +20.3% |
| RENWICK, REGINALD A | 1 | 70.3% | +9.8% |
| AJIBADE AKONAI, OLUMIDE | 1 | 84.5% | +9.0% |
| PATEL, JAYESH A | 1 | 83.7% | +4.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18898098 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR THREE DIMENSIONAL OBJECT TRACKING USING COMBINATION OF RADAR AND IMAGE DATA | RENWICK, REGINALD A | — |
| 18825793 | Method for Determining Spin of a Projectile | AJIBADE AKONAI, OLUMIDE | — |
| 18807098 | MANAGING OBJECT TRACKING | PATEL, JAYESH A | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19085739 | PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE | WU, JERRY | — | §102 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 20, 2025 |
| 18898098 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR THREE DIMENSIONAL OBJECT TRACKING USING COMBINATION OF RADAR AND IMAGE DATA | RENWICK, REGINALD A | — | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 26, 2024 |
| 18825793 | Method for Determining Spin of a Projectile | AJIBADE AKONAI, OLUMIDE | — | §101DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 05, 2024 |
| 18807098 | MANAGING OBJECT TRACKING | PATEL, JAYESH A | — | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 16, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial