Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
2 pending office actions • 0 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Toscotec S P A currently manages 1 pending office action. The prosecution of this portfolio involves a distinct examiner and 0 distinct art units. This indicates a highly specific point of interaction within the patent office for the company's current filings, with no distribution across different technical departments. The company's current strategy is focused on a single application rather than a broad portfolio.
CALANDRA, ANTHONY J is the busiest examiner for the company, with 1 busiest examiner pending action. This examiner is responsible for the total pending office actions currently active. The company's immediate patent outcomes are dependent on the resolution of this action by the assigned examiner. With 0 distinct art units reported, the prosecution effort is centered entirely on the interaction with this one individual. This concentrated workload allows the company to focus its resources on the examiner's requirements and specific examination style.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 2 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| CALANDRA, ANTHONY J | 1 | 62.8% | +18.7% |
| VERA, ELISA H | 1 | 72.2% | +26.5% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18871243 | YANKEE DRIER FOR PAPER PRODUCTION | CALANDRA, ANTHONY J | — |
| 18871254 | PAPERMAKING MACHINE | VERA, ELISA H | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18871243 | YANKEE DRIER FOR PAPER PRODUCTION | CALANDRA, ANTHONY J | — | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 03, 2024 |
| 18871254 | PAPERMAKING MACHINE | VERA, ELISA H | — | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 03, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial