Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Communications
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
TouchNetix Limited currently has 1 pending office action within the Communications technology area. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and is located within 1 distinct art unit. This concentration shows a singular focus for the company's current filings without any departmental or personnel overlap.
The busiest examiner is ADEDIRAN, ABDUL -SAMAD A, who manages the 1 pending office action. This examiner is the only individual currently reviewing the company's pending work. With 1 pending office action and 1 distinct examiner, the prosecution process is centralized within a single art unit. This allows for a targeted strategy that addresses the specific technical standards and procedural preferences of this one examiner in the communications field.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ADEDIRAN, ABDUL -SAMAD A | 1 | 78.7% | +13.4% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19118216 | TOUCH-SENSITIVE APPARATUS AND METHOD | ADEDIRAN, ABDUL -SAMAD A | 2d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2621 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19118216 | TOUCH-SENSITIVE APPARATUS AND METHOD | ADEDIRAN, ABDUL -SAMAD A | 2621 | §103 | Final Rejection | 2d overdue | Pending | Apr 03, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial