Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 26, 2026

Toyota Industries Corporation

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 7 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Toyota Industries Corporation currently manages 3 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. Each of these 3 actions is assigned to a different individual, as there are 3 distinct examiners involved in the prosecution. These examiners are located in 3 distinct art units, indicating that each pending application is being reviewed by a different specialized group at the patent office.

DAVID M UPCHURCH is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, with 1 pending office action. Because each of the 3 distinct examiners has exactly 1 pending action, the workload is distributed equally across the group. This 1:1 ratio between the 3 pending office actions and the 3 distinct examiners suggests a diverse set of filings within the transportation space. Practitioners should prepare for 3 independent prosecution paths, as no single examiner or art unit oversees more than 1 of the current pending matters.

The presence of 3 distinct art units for only 3 pending office actions highlights the specialized nature of the company's technology. David M Upchurch and the other examiners will each apply the specific standards of their respective units to the applications. This decentralized environment means that success in 1 case may not necessarily predict outcomes in the others. Practitioners must tailor their arguments to the specific preferences of the 3 different examiners and the 3 units they represent.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (33%)
2
Medium (67%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§102 only2 (67%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
UPCHURCH, DAVID M 1 73.7% +18.0%
GOKHALE, PRASAD V 1 85.9% +8.4%
BUTCHER, CAROLINE N 1 81.2% +13.3%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19108538 SHOCK ABSORPTION STRUCTURE FOR VEHICLE BODY BUTCHER, CAROLINE N —

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19121140 VEHICULAR OPERATION PEDAL DEVICE GOKHALE, PRASAD V —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19259356 FIXING STRUCTURE UPCHURCH, DAVID M —
19108538 SHOCK ABSORPTION STRUCTURE FOR VEHICLE BODY BUTCHER, CAROLINE N —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3677 1
3617 1
3612 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19259356 FIXING STRUCTURE UPCHURCH, DAVID M 3677 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 03, 2025
19121140 VEHICULAR OPERATION PEDAL DEVICE GOKHALE, PRASAD V 3617 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 15, 2025
19108538 SHOCK ABSORPTION STRUCTURE FOR VEHICLE BODY BUTCHER, CAROLINE N 3612 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 04, 2025

Managing Toyota Industries Corporation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Toyota Industries Corporation have?

Toyota Industries Corporation has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 3 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Toyota Industries Corporation applications?

David M Upchurch has the most, with 1 of Toyota Industries Corporation's pending office actions.

What technology area are Toyota Industries Corporation's patent applications in?

Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month