Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days
Traitware Inc. has 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This activity is concentrated under 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. The singular nature of these figures suggests a focused prosecution effort for the company's current pending matters.
The busiest examiner for the company is QAYYUM, ZESHAN, who is overseeing 1 busiest examiner pending action. This 1 examiner is the individual currently managing the company's pending applications. Understanding the specific preferences and prior rulings of this 1 examiner is essential for successfully navigating the 1 pending office action.
With 1 distinct art unit involved, the prosecution process is streamlined. The company does not face the challenge of coordinating across different art units with varying standards. The focus remains on the 1 pending office action and the specific requirements of the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area as interpreted by the assigned examiner.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| QAYYUM, ZESHAN | 1 | 40.5% | +30.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17658505 | Authentication System | QAYYUM, ZESHAN | 70d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17658505 | Authentication System | QAYYUM, ZESHAN | 70d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3697 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17658505 | Authentication System | QAYYUM, ZESHAN | 3697 | §101§103§112 | Final Rejection | 70d | Pending | Apr 08, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial