Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Transaera, Inc. currently manages 1 pending office action within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This prosecution is localized in 1 distinct art unit, indicating a focused technical review for the company's current intellectual property. The workload is handled by a distinct examiner, concentrating the company's interactions with the patent office into a single point of review. This concentration means that the immediate patent strategy is subject to the specific interpretations of a single administrative unit.
LAWRENCE JR, FRANK M is the busiest examiner for the company, with 1 pending office action currently assigned. This individual is responsible for the entirety of the reported portfolio. For practitioners, this means that the current progress of the company's Chemistry & Materials filings is subject to the specific feedback of this one examiner within the designated art unit. The lack of multiple examiners or art units simplifies the tracking of prosecution trends for this portfolio at this time.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LAWRENCE JR, FRANK M | 1 | 83.9% | +19.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18529532 | AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEM WITH MULTIPLE ENERGY STORAGE SUB-SYSTEMS | LAWRENCE JR, FRANK M | 124d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18529532 | AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEM WITH MULTIPLE ENERGY STORAGE SUB-SYSTEMS | LAWRENCE JR, FRANK M | 124d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1776 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18529532 | AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEM WITH MULTIPLE ENERGY STORAGE SUB-SYSTEMS | LAWRENCE JR, FRANK M | 1776 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | 124d overdue | Pending | Dec 05, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial