3 pending office actions • 0 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days
Transmed7 LLC has 2 pending office actions. These actions are assigned to 2 distinct examiners. The data shows 0 distinct art units for this portfolio. Jing Rui Ou is the busiest examiner, responsible for 1 pending office action. This indicates the 2 pending office actions are split between the 2 distinct examiners, requiring the company to manage two separate examiner relationships.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §102 only | 1 (33%) |
| §112 only | 1 (33%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (33%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| NGUYEN, TUAN VAN | 1 | 81.7% | +19.5% |
| OU, JING RUI | 1 | 53.3% | +51.5% |
| GEIGER, RACHAEL L | 1 | 82.3% | +18.3% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18443087 | SOFT TISSUE BIOPSY OR EXCISIONAL DEVICES AND METHODS | GEIGER, RACHAEL L | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19019430 | EXCISIONAL DEVICES AND METHODS | NGUYEN, TUAN VAN | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19019430 | EXCISIONAL DEVICES AND METHODS | NGUYEN, TUAN VAN | — |
| 18781437 | EXCISIONAL DEVICES AND METHODS | OU, JING RUI | — |
| 18443087 | SOFT TISSUE BIOPSY OR EXCISIONAL DEVICES AND METHODS | GEIGER, RACHAEL L | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19019430 | EXCISIONAL DEVICES AND METHODS | NGUYEN, TUAN VAN | — | §102§103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jan 13, 2025 |
| 18781437 | EXCISIONAL DEVICES AND METHODS | OU, JING RUI | — | §112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 23, 2024 |
| 18443087 | SOFT TISSUE BIOPSY OR EXCISIONAL DEVICES AND METHODS | GEIGER, RACHAEL L | — | §102 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Feb 15, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial