Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Transtar Autobody Technologies LLC is pursuing patent rights in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The company's portfolio currently includes 1 pending office action. This 1 action is being processed within 1 distinct art unit, indicating that the company's current legal efforts are concentrated in 1 technical division. This focused approach allows for a specialized prosecution strategy tailored to the requirements of that 1 unit. The 1 pending office action serves as the current focal point for the company's patent strategy.
The prosecution involves 1 distinct examiner, WU, ANDREA, who is also the busiest examiner for the portfolio. This examiner is currently managing 1 pending office action. With 1 pending action under review by this 1 examiner, the company's immediate path to patent allowance depends on successfully navigating the specific examination criteria of this individual. The company's entire active prosecution profile is currently subject to the review of this 1 examiner. Practitioners should focus on the specific feedback from this 1 distinct examiner to resolve the 1 pending office action.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| WU, ANDREA | 1 | 68.4% | +20.1% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18385621 | SPRAYABLE TEXTURE COATING COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF APPLICATION | WU, ANDREA | 177d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1763 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18385621 | SPRAYABLE TEXTURE COATING COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF APPLICATION | WU, ANDREA | 1763 | §103 | Final Rejection | 177d overdue | Pending | Oct 31, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial