Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
7 pending office actions • 5 art units • 6 examiners • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
The portfolio has 7 pending office actions in Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems. The matters are distributed among 6 distinct examiners and 5 distinct art units, indicating a portfolio that spans multiple examination assignments with overlap at both the examiner and unit levels.
HAWK, NOAH CHANDLER is the busiest examiner, with 2 pending matters. That assignment is the clearest concentration point in the available data, making it useful for coordinating related response timing and claim strategy.
The broader distribution means counsel should maintain matter-level records while also looking for recurring issues within the shared art-unit structure. Examiner-specific treatment remains relevant because the pending work is not handled by one examiner alone.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 2 (29%) |
| §112 only | 3 (43%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 2 (29%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| HAWK, NOAH CHANDLER | 2 | 61.3% | +22.5% |
| ADAMS, NATHANIEL L | 1 | 72.2% | +19.6% |
| WILKINSON, RALPH DAVID | 1 | 50.0% | +100.0% |
| FRAZIER, BRADY W | 1 | 78.6% | +26.9% |
| MATTEI, BRIAN DAVID | 1 | 67.3% | +15.5% |
| WOOD, KIMBERLY T | 1 | 54.8% | +27.6% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18686821 | PULLEY ASSEMBLY | ADAMS, NATHANIEL L | — |
| 17928801 | RACKING CARABINER | WILKINSON, RALPH DAVID | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17796614 | LANYARD ASSEMBLY | MATTEI, BRIAN DAVID | 35d overdue |
| 17628270 | HARNESSES | WOOD, KIMBERLY T | 30d overdue |
| 18571156 | HARNESSES | HAWK, NOAH CHANDLER | 23d overdue |
| 18686821 | PULLEY ASSEMBLY | ADAMS, NATHANIEL L | — |
| 17928801 | RACKING CARABINER | WILKINSON, RALPH DAVID | — |
| 18049672 | HARNESSES | FRAZIER, BRADY W | — |
| 17801616 | HARNESSES | HAWK, NOAH CHANDLER | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3654 | 2 |
| 3636 | 2 |
| 3648 | 1 |
| 3635 | 1 |
| 3631 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18686821 | PULLEY ASSEMBLY | ADAMS, NATHANIEL L | 3654 | §102§103§112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Feb 26, 2024 |
| 18571156 | HARNESSES | HAWK, NOAH CHANDLER | 3636 | §112 | Final Rejection | 23d overdue | Pending | Dec 15, 2023 |
| 17928801 | RACKING CARABINER | WILKINSON, RALPH DAVID | 3654 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 30, 2022 |
| 18049672 | HARNESSES | FRAZIER, BRADY W | 3648 | §112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 26, 2022 |
| 17801616 | HARNESSES | HAWK, NOAH CHANDLER | 3636 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 23, 2022 |
| 17796614 | LANYARD ASSEMBLY | MATTEI, BRIAN DAVID | 3635 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 35d overdue | Pending | Jul 29, 2022 |
| 17628270 | HARNESSES | WOOD, KIMBERLY T | 3631 | §112 | Non-Final OA | 30d overdue | Pending | Jan 19, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialTreemagineers Ltd. has 7 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 5 art units and 6 examiners.
Noah Chandler Hawk has the most, with 2 of Treemagineers Ltd.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
