Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Tristent Development SAS maintains a company patent portfolio within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. The portfolio currently shows 1 pending office action. This single action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and is being processed in 1 distinct art unit. This reflects a very specific and limited scope of current prosecution activity. For a practitioner, this means that the prosecution strategy is entirely dependent on the interaction with this 1 distinct examiner and the specific standards of the 1 distinct art unit.
The busiest examiner for Tristent Development SAS is BARIA, DINAH N, who is currently managing 1 busiest examiner pending action. Since the total number of pending office actions is 1, BARIA, DINAH N is the sole official responsible for the company's current patent review. The involvement of only 1 distinct art unit further suggests that the pending matter falls within a specific technical niche of the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering field. This concentration requires a targeted approach to satisfy the examiner's requirements, as the outcome of the 1 pending office action will define the current success of the portfolio.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BARIA, DINAH N | 1 | 72.9% | +28.5% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18626056 | DELIVERY SYSTEM FOR A FURCATED STENT | BARIA, DINAH N | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3774 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18626056 | DELIVERY SYSTEM FOR A FURCATED STENT | BARIA, DINAH N | 3774 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Apr 03, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialTristent Development SAS has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Dinah N Baria has the most, with 1 of Tristent Development SAS's pending office actions.
Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.