Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Triton Systems Inc.

Technology areas: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Triton Systems Inc. manages 5 pending office actions within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These 5 pending office actions are distributed among 5 distinct examiners, meaning each case is being reviewed by a different individual. However, these examiners are grouped within 3 distinct art units, suggesting that the company's Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering filings are concentrated in a few specific departments despite the variety of examiners involved.

The busiest examiner, LEE, MICHELLE J, holds 1 pending office action, which is consistent with the even distribution across the 5 distinct examiners. For the practitioner, this means that no single examiner's habits will dominate the portfolio. Instead, the focus should be on the 3 distinct art units, as these departments likely share common prior art and internal policies. Managing 5 pending office actions across 5 distinct examiners requires a strategy that accounts for diverse individual styles while respecting the shared standards of the 3 distinct art units in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering sector.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (33%)
2
Medium (67%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (33%)
Double-patenting + other1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LEE, MICHELLE J 1 39.8% +60.2%
NELSON, KERI JESSICA 1 58.6% +41.2%
LAWSON, STACY N 1 62.3% +51.2%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17838025 GROUP ANCHOR SYSTEM, SUBSEA INSTALLATION SYSTEM, METHOD FOR USING AND INSTALLING SAME LAWSON, STACY N 28d

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17838025 GROUP ANCHOR SYSTEM, SUBSEA INSTALLATION SYSTEM, METHOD FOR USING AND INSTALLING SAME LAWSON, STACY N 28d
19045129 EARPLUG LEE, MICHELLE J —
18176966 ORTHOSIS SYSTEM NELSON, KERI JESSICA —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3786 2
3678 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19045129 EARPLUG LEE, MICHELLE J 3786 §103§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 04, 2025
18176966 ORTHOSIS SYSTEM NELSON, KERI JESSICA 3786 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 01, 2023
17838025 GROUP ANCHOR SYSTEM, SUBSEA INSTALLATION SYSTEM, METHOD FOR USING AND INSTALLING SAME LAWSON, STACY N 3678 §103§112 Non-Final OA 28d Pending Jun 10, 2022

Managing Triton Systems Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Triton Systems Inc. have?

Triton Systems Inc. has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 3 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Triton Systems Inc. applications?

Michelle J Lee has the most, with 1 of Triton Systems Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Triton Systems Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month