Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Trizell Ltd. is currently navigating the patent prosecution process with 1 pending office action. This single active matter indicates a focused or early-stage interaction with the patent office. The prosecution involves 1 distinct examiner, who is responsible for reviewing the technical merits of the application. The data shows that there are 0 distinct art units associated with this profile, which may reflect the specific administrative status or categorization of the pending matter within the office's internal tracking systems.
The examiner identified as the most active for this portfolio is SALVOZA, M FRANCO G. This individual is currently handling 1 pending office action, which represents the entirety of the company's pending workload. With only 1 examiner and 1 pending action, the prosecution strategy is highly centralized. Practitioners should monitor the progress of SALVOZA, M FRANCO G to understand the likely trajectory of the portfolio's development and the potential for future allowance or further rejection of the company's intellectual property claims.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Double-patenting + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SALVOZA, M FRANCO G | 1 | 68.4% | +30.0% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18804255 | VIRAL VECTOR STABILIZATION | SALVOZA, M FRANCO G | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18804255 | VIRAL VECTOR STABILIZATION | SALVOZA, M FRANCO G | — | §102DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 14, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial