Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
3 pending office actions • 1 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Trojan Technologies Group Ulc has 3 pending office actions in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These 3 actions are assigned to 3 distinct examiners, but all are located within 1 distinct art unit. This creates a unique situation where the technical field is highly concentrated, but the individual reviewers are diverse. RAABE, CHRISTOPHER M is the busiest examiner, holding 1 pending office action.
The presence of 3 distinct examiners for only 3 pending office actions means there is no examiner overlap. RAABE, CHRISTOPHER M is one of three individuals each handling a single action. Despite this, the 1 distinct art unit indicates that all 3 pending actions are classified within the same technical area of Chemistry & Materials.
For a practitioner, this profile suggests that while the technical arguments may be similar across the 3 pending office actions, they must be tailored to 3 different examiners. The 1 distinct art unit provides a very narrow technical focus for the portfolio. RAABE, CHRISTOPHER M and his colleagues each manage 1 of the 3 active matters, requiring a unified technical strategy across 3 distinct examiners.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (33%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 2 (67%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| RAABE, CHRISTOPHER M | 1 | 68.3% | +27.3% |
| ABDEL LATIF, MAHMOUD MOTAZ | 1 | 75.0% | +0.0% |
| GONZALEZ, MADELINE | 1 | 72.6% | +15.7% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18951940 | UV RADIATION SOURCE ASSEMBLY | RAABE, CHRISTOPHER M | — |
| 18798135 | CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR UV WATER TREATMENT REACTOR | ABDEL LATIF, MAHMOUD MOTAZ | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18388361 | DISINFECTION REACTOR WITH SPIRAL FLOW | GONZALEZ, MADELINE | 9d overdue |
| 18951940 | UV RADIATION SOURCE ASSEMBLY | RAABE, CHRISTOPHER M | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1773 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18951940 | UV RADIATION SOURCE ASSEMBLY | RAABE, CHRISTOPHER M | — | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 19, 2024 |
| 18798135 | CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR UV WATER TREATMENT REACTOR | ABDEL LATIF, MAHMOUD MOTAZ | — | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 08, 2024 |
| 18388361 | DISINFECTION REACTOR WITH SPIRAL FLOW | GONZALEZ, MADELINE | 1773 | §103 | Final Rejection | 9d overdue | Pending | Nov 09, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial