Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

TrueBinding, Inc.

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

4 pending office actions • 3 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

TrueBinding, Inc. is currently navigating 4 pending office actions in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. The portfolio is managed by 4 distinct examiners, which means each pending action is under the review of a unique official. This one-to-one ratio between actions and examiners ensures that the company's success is not tied to the decision-making of a single individual, but rather distributed across multiple reviewers. For the practitioner, this provides a variety of perspectives that can be beneficial for navigating complex technical rejections.

These filings are distributed among 3 distinct art units, showing a slight concentration of technical focus within the biotechnology sector. The busiest examiner, BELYAVSKYI, MICHAIL A, holds 1 pending office action, mirroring the balanced distribution seen across the entire portfolio. This structure requires the applicant to manage interactions with three different technical divisions, each with its own set of standards, while benefiting from the diverse perspectives of four different examiners. This arrangement suggests a focused yet technically diverse approach to biotechnological innovation.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (50%)
0
Medium (0%)
2
Easy (50%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§112 only1 (25%)
Double-patenting only1 (25%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

4
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BELYAVSKYI, MICHAIL A 1 63.9% +28.0%
HAMA, JOANNE 1 25.4% +40.2%
WANG, CHANG YU 1 33.4% +53.7%
ALLEN, MARIANNE P 1 60.1% +18.4%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18637068 METHODS OF TREATING EYE DISEASE BELYAVSKYI, MICHAIL A —
18492607 ANTI-GAL3 ANTIBODY FORMULATIONS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF HAMA, JOANNE —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18053191 METHODS OF TREATING OR INHIBITING CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES WANG, CHANG YU 26d overdue
18637068 METHODS OF TREATING EYE DISEASE BELYAVSKYI, MICHAIL A —
18492607 ANTI-GAL3 ANTIBODY FORMULATIONS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF HAMA, JOANNE —
17834703 ANTI-GAL3 ANTIBODIES AND METHODS OF USE FOR INSULIN RESISTANCE ALLEN, MARIANNE P —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1647 2
1644 1
1675 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18637068 METHODS OF TREATING EYE DISEASE BELYAVSKYI, MICHAIL A 1644 §103§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 16, 2024
18492607 ANTI-GAL3 ANTIBODY FORMULATIONS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF HAMA, JOANNE 1647 §103§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 23, 2023
18053191 METHODS OF TREATING OR INHIBITING CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES WANG, CHANG YU 1675 §112 Final Rejection 26d overdue Pending Nov 07, 2022
17834703 ANTI-GAL3 ANTIBODIES AND METHODS OF USE FOR INSULIN RESISTANCE ALLEN, MARIANNE P 1647 DP Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 07, 2022

Managing TrueBinding, Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does TrueBinding, Inc. have?

TrueBinding, Inc. has 4 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 4 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most TrueBinding, Inc. applications?

Michail A Belyavskyi has the most, with 1 of TrueBinding, Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are TrueBinding, Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals (USPTO Tech Center 1600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month