Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Networking & Security
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Truecaller International LLP is engaged in the Networking & Security technology area, where it has 1 pending office action. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, MCBETH, WILLIAM C. As the busiest examiner for the portfolio, MCBETH, WILLIAM C is currently managing 1 pending office action.
The company's prosecution activity is localized in 1 distinct art unit. This concentration indicates that the current patent office interaction is limited to a single point of contact and a single organizational unit. For practitioners, the outcome of the 1 pending office action is the sole focus of the portfolio's current status in Networking & Security. There are no other pending actions or examiners to provide a broader context for prosecution trends within this specific company profile. Consequently, the firm's immediate patent strategy is highly sensitive to the individual examination style of MCBETH, WILLIAM C. The data suggests a streamlined approach to patenting within the Networking & Security field at this time.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCBETH, WILLIAM C | 1 | 66.8% | +57.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18726220 | Methods, Systems and Computer Program Products for Optimizing Identification of Communication Device Based Spamming | MCBETH, WILLIAM C | 113d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18726220 | Methods, Systems and Computer Program Products for Optimizing Identification of Communication Device Based Spamming | MCBETH, WILLIAM C | 113d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2449 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18726220 | Methods, Systems and Computer Program Products for Optimizing Identification of Communication Device Based Spamming | MCBETH, WILLIAM C | 2449 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | 113d overdue | Pending | Jul 02, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial