Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Trusval Technology Co. Ltd. manages 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, DERUSSO, JOHN J. The prosecution is active in 1 distinct art unit. DERUSSO, JOHN J is the busiest examiner, overseeing 1 pending office action. This 1 pending office action is the only active matter for the company. The company's patent strategy is currently highly localized.
The company's work in Chemistry & Materials is currently represented by 1 pending office action. This case is being reviewed by 1 distinct examiner, DERUSSO, JOHN J, within 1 distinct art unit. With only 1 pending office action total, the company's patent strategy is highly focused. Practitioners should tailor their approach to the specific tendencies of DERUSSO, JOHN J and the standards of the single art unit to achieve success for the company's intellectual property.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| DERUSSO, JOHN J | 1 | 80.5% | +14.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18812197 | METHOD OF MANUFACTURING WIRE COVERING MATERIAL FOR PREVENTION OF SPILLOVER LOSS DURING TRANSMISSION OF HIGH FREQUENCY SIGNAL | DERUSSO, JOHN J | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18812197 | METHOD OF MANUFACTURING WIRE COVERING MATERIAL FOR PREVENTION OF SPILLOVER LOSS DURING TRANSMISSION OF HIGH FREQUENCY SIGNAL | DERUSSO, JOHN J | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1744 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18812197 | METHOD OF MANUFACTURING WIRE COVERING MATERIAL FOR PREVENTION OF SPILLOVER LOSS DURING TRANSMISSION OF HIGH FREQUENCY SIGNAL | DERUSSO, JOHN J | 1744 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 22, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialTrusval Technology Co. Ltd. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
John J Derusso has the most, with 1 of Trusval Technology Co. Ltd.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
