Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Twin Health, Inc.

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

5 pending office actions • 4 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Twin Health, Inc. manages a company patent portfolio in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The portfolio currently has 5 pending office actions. These actions are distributed among 5 distinct examiners and 4 distinct art units. This distribution indicates a high degree of examiner diversity, with some overlap in the technical departments handling the applications at the patent office.

The busiest examiner for Twin Health, Inc. is LUAN, SCOTT, who is handling 1 busiest examiner pending office action. With 5 pending office actions and 5 distinct examiners, no single examiner holds a majority of the workload. The use of 4 distinct art units for 5 actions suggests that at least two applications are being processed within the same technical unit. For a practitioner, this requires managing five separate prosecution tracks while potentially benefiting from some consistency in art unit policies for a portion of the portfolio. This diversity necessitates a versatile approach to patent strategy across the transportation and e-commerce sectors while monitoring the 4 distinct art units for procedural trends.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (80%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
1
Unknown (20%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only2 (40%)
§101 + other2 (40%)
No statute on record1 (20%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
80% of docket
1
Business / Other
20% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LUAN, SCOTT 1 65.6% +12.2%
SOREY, ROBERT A 1 49.4% +45.3%
TOKARCZYK, CHRISTOPHER B 1 44.3% +23.4%
PATEL, JAY M 1 65.0% +39.6%
RUIZ, JOSHUA DAMIAN 1 0.0% +0.0%

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18623790 DYNAMICALLY MODELING THE EFFECT OF FOOD ITEMS AND ACTIVITY ON A PATIENT'S METABOLIC HEALTH SOREY, ROBERT A 59d overdue
18508197 PRECISION BIOLOGY SEARCH WITH MACHINE LEARNING AND DIGITAL TWIN TECHNOLOGY TOKARCZYK, CHRISTOPHER B 44d overdue
17963933 Generating Instructions for Physical Experiments Using Whole Body Digital Twin Technology PATEL, JAY M 23d overdue
17963932 Generating Patient Cohorts for Simulating Clinical Trials Using Whole Body Digital Twin Technology RUIZ, JOSHUA DAMIAN —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18623790 DYNAMICALLY MODELING THE EFFECT OF FOOD ITEMS AND ACTIVITY ON A PATIENT'S METABOLIC HEALTH SOREY, ROBERT A 59d overdue
18508197 PRECISION BIOLOGY SEARCH WITH MACHINE LEARNING AND DIGITAL TWIN TECHNOLOGY TOKARCZYK, CHRISTOPHER B 44d overdue
17963933 Generating Instructions for Physical Experiments Using Whole Body Digital Twin Technology PATEL, JAY M 23d overdue
19217524 METABOLIC HEALTH USING A PRECISION TREATMENT PLATFORM ENABLED BY WHOLE BODY DIGITAL TWIN TECHNOLOGY LUAN, SCOTT —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3682 1
3687 1
3681 1
3684 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19217524 METABOLIC HEALTH USING A PRECISION TREATMENT PLATFORM ENABLED BY WHOLE BODY DIGITAL TWIN TECHNOLOGY LUAN, SCOTT — Other Non-Final OA — Pending May 23, 2025
18623790 DYNAMICALLY MODELING THE EFFECT OF FOOD ITEMS AND ACTIVITY ON A PATIENT'S METABOLIC HEALTH SOREY, ROBERT A 3682 §101 Non-Final OA 59d overdue Pending Apr 01, 2024
18508197 PRECISION BIOLOGY SEARCH WITH MACHINE LEARNING AND DIGITAL TWIN TECHNOLOGY TOKARCZYK, CHRISTOPHER B 3687 §101 Final Rejection 44d overdue Pending Nov 13, 2023
17963933 Generating Instructions for Physical Experiments Using Whole Body Digital Twin Technology PATEL, JAY M 3681 §101§112 Final Rejection 23d overdue Pending Oct 11, 2022
17963932 Generating Patient Cohorts for Simulating Clinical Trials Using Whole Body Digital Twin Technology RUIZ, JOSHUA DAMIAN 3684 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 11, 2022

Managing Twin Health, Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Twin Health, Inc. have?

Twin Health, Inc. has 5 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 4 art units and 5 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Twin Health, Inc. applications?

Scott Luan has the most, with 1 of Twin Health, Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Twin Health, Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month