Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Türk & Hillinger GmbH

Technology areas: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Türk & Hillinger GmbH currently faces 3 pending office actions within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These matters are distributed across 3 distinct examiners, which indicates that each case is being reviewed by a different individual. Furthermore, the prosecution activity spans 2 distinct art units, suggesting a diversification in the technical classification of the company's current patent filings.

The busiest examiner for this portfolio is EVANGELISTA, THEODORE JUSTINE, who is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending office action. Since there are 3 pending office actions in total and 3 distinct examiners, the workload is spread across the involved individuals. This distribution means that no single examiner holds a majority of the pending workload, potentially leading to varied prosecution experiences across the different matters.

For practitioners, the involvement of 2 distinct art units within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering sector requires a strategy that accounts for different procedural norms. While EVANGELISTA, THEODORE JUSTINE handles 1 busiest examiner pending office action, the other actions are managed by different examiners. This variety suggests that the legal team must remain adaptable to the specific feedback and examination styles of the distinct examiners across the 2 distinct art units.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (67%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
33% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
67% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
EVANGELISTA, THEODORE JUSTINE 1 64.1% +19.5%
DANG, KET D 1 61.5% +37.9%
PARK, JE HWAN JOHN 1 0.0% +0.0%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18137244 COMPRESSIBLE ELECTRIC HEATER PARK, JE HWAN JOHN 16d
18276268 METHOD FOR PRODUCING A TUBULAR HEATING CARTRIDGE FOR ELECTRICAL HEATING DEVICES, HEATING ELEMENT BLANK FOR SUCH A HEATING CARTRIDGE, AND A HEATING CARTRIDGE EVANGELISTA, THEODORE JUSTINE —
18276220 ELECTRIC HEATING DEVICE AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING AN ELECTRIC HEATING DEVICE DANG, KET D —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18276268 METHOD FOR PRODUCING A TUBULAR HEATING CARTRIDGE FOR ELECTRICAL HEATING DEVICES, HEATING ELEMENT BLANK FOR SUCH A HEATING CARTRIDGE, AND A HEATING CARTRIDGE EVANGELISTA, THEODORE JUSTINE —
18276220 ELECTRIC HEATING DEVICE AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING AN ELECTRIC HEATING DEVICE DANG, KET D —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3761 2
2898 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18276268 METHOD FOR PRODUCING A TUBULAR HEATING CARTRIDGE FOR ELECTRICAL HEATING DEVICES, HEATING ELEMENT BLANK FOR SUCH A HEATING CARTRIDGE, AND A HEATING CARTRIDGE EVANGELISTA, THEODORE JUSTINE 3761 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 08, 2023
18276220 ELECTRIC HEATING DEVICE AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING AN ELECTRIC HEATING DEVICE DANG, KET D 2898 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 07, 2023
18137244 COMPRESSIBLE ELECTRIC HEATER PARK, JE HWAN JOHN 3761 §103 Final Rejection 16d Pending Apr 20, 2023

Managing Türk & Hillinger GmbH's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month