Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
UAB Deeper currently manages 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This prosecution is handled by 1 distinct examiner and is located in 1 distinct art unit. The assigned official is ARMSTRONG, JONATHAN D, who is the busiest examiner for the company with 1 pending action. This data indicates a highly focused and singular prosecution path for the company's current mechanical innovations.
The presence of 1 distinct art unit suggests that the company's intellectual property is concentrated in a specific technical niche. For a practitioner, this means the strategy can be entirely centered on the requirements of ARMSTRONG, JONATHAN D. There is no complexity from multiple examiners or varying art unit standards to navigate. The prosecution of this 1 pending office action can proceed with a clear focus on the specific examiner's past actions and preferences. This streamlined environment, involving only 1 distinct examiner, allows for a direct approach to resolving the current application without the need for broader coordination across the USPTO. The company's immediate patent goals in the transportation and mechanical sector are thus tied to this single examination process.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARMSTRONG, JONATHAN D | 1 | 55.3% | +3.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18725298 | AREA SCANNING AND BAIT DISTRIBUTION FOR FISHING | ARMSTRONG, JONATHAN D | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3645 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18725298 | AREA SCANNING AND BAIT DISTRIBUTION FOR FISHING | ARMSTRONG, JONATHAN D | 3645 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 28, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialUAB Deeper has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Jonathan D Armstrong has the most, with 1 of UAB Deeper's pending office actions.
Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
