Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Ubeing Inc. currently has 1 pending office action. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, DIETZ, NOE ROBERT. The data shows 0 distinct art units for this portfolio, which indicates a specific administrative status in the current record. This single pending action represents the total current office action activity for the company, reflecting a highly focused prosecution phase.
DIETZ, NOE ROBERT is the busiest examiner, handling 1 pending office action. With only 1 distinct examiner involved, the prosecution is entirely concentrated. This one-to-one relationship between the examiner and the pending action allows for a direct line of communication. The absence of multiple art units, as shown by the 0 distinct art units figure, simplifies the organizational overhead for the practitioner. Because DIETZ, NOE ROBERT is responsible for the 1 pending office action, the prosecution strategy can be entirely tailored to this examiner's specific feedback. This centralized structure ensures that all current efforts are directed toward resolving the single matter at hand.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| DIETZ, NOE ROBERT | 1 | 0.0% | +0.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18576228 | ELECTRIC TASTE ADJUSTMENT DEVICE AND ELECTRIC TASTE TESTING DEVICE | DIETZ, NOE ROBERT | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18576228 | ELECTRIC TASTE ADJUSTMENT DEVICE AND ELECTRIC TASTE TESTING DEVICE | DIETZ, NOE ROBERT | — | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jan 03, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial