Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

UCB Holdings, Inc.

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

UCB Holdings, Inc. currently has 2 pending office actions within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. These 2 actions are distributed across 2 distinct examiners, meaning each examiner is handling a separate matter. Furthermore, the actions are located in 2 distinct art units, indicating that the company's pharmaceutical interests span different technical classifications. This distribution requires the applicant to monitor different examination styles simultaneously while maintaining a consistent overall strategy for the portfolio.

MIKNIS, ZACHARY J is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, currently managing 1 busiest examiner pending office action. The other pending action is handled by the other distinct examiner. This distribution across multiple art units and examiners suggests that the applicant must manage separate prosecution tracks, each potentially subject to different examiner preferences and art unit norms. Practitioners should be prepared to address the specific concerns of separate officials, even though the technical focus remains within the biotechnology field. The presence of 2 distinct art units indicates that the company's applications are classified under different categories, each with its own set of prior art.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (50%)
1
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Double-patenting + other1 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MIKNIS, ZACHARY J 1 68.5% +32.4%
BEANE, RANDALL L 1 32.9% +36.2%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17605495 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR MODULATING COMPLEMENT ACTIVITY BEANE, RANDALL L 43d overdue

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17605495 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR MODULATING COMPLEMENT ACTIVITY BEANE, RANDALL L 43d overdue
18599164 MODULATORS OF COMPLEMENT ACTIVITY MIKNIS, ZACHARY J —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1658 1
1654 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18599164 MODULATORS OF COMPLEMENT ACTIVITY MIKNIS, ZACHARY J 1658 §112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 07, 2024
17605495 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR MODULATING COMPLEMENT ACTIVITY BEANE, RANDALL L 1654 §103§112 Final Rejection 43d overdue Pending Oct 21, 2021

Managing UCB Holdings, Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does UCB Holdings, Inc. have?

UCB Holdings, Inc. has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most UCB Holdings, Inc. applications?

Zachary J Miknis has the most, with 1 of UCB Holdings, Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are UCB Holdings, Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals (USPTO Tech Center 1600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month