Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
10 pending office actions • 4 art units • 10 examiners • 0 of 10 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 7 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 7 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 3 (30%) |
| §101 + other | 7 (70%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| GOYEA, OLUSEGUN | 1 | 65.0% | +33.7% |
| BOND, REED MADISON | 1 | 9.1% | +19.4% |
| WEBB III, JAMES L | 1 | 14.3% | +22.9% |
| LOFTIS, JOHNNA RONEE | 1 | 43.1% | +4.9% |
| GUNN, JEREMY L | 1 | 29.8% | +45.8% |
| SCHEUNEMANN, RICHARD N | 1 | 6.3% | +8.3% |
| HENRY, MATTHEW D | 1 | 30.0% | +20.5% |
| SWARTZ, STEPHEN S | 1 | 31.4% | +25.8% |
| OBAID, HAMZEH M | 1 | 38.2% | +22.3% |
| GUILIANO, CHARLES A | 1 | 37.3% | +37.6% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18158646 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TIMEKEEPING AND SCHEDULING | SWARTZ, STEPHEN S | 36d overdue |
| 18448793 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR TRACKING WORKER BENEFACTION AT AN ORGANIZATION | LOFTIS, JOHNNA RONEE | 17d overdue |
| 18158643 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ADJUSTING A TIME SEQUENCE RESPONSIVE TO A PREDICTED OR A DETECTED AUSTERE EVENT | SCHEUNEMANN, RICHARD N | 8d overdue |
| 18476716 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GEOGRAPHY-BASED DATA COLLECTION AND EVALUATION | GOYEA, OLUSEGUN | 5d overdue |
| 18158669 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SCHEDULE EXPERIMENTATION | GUNN, JEREMY L | 9d |
| 18476864 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SELF-SCHEDULE RECOMMENDATIONS | BOND, REED MADISON | 34d |
| 18158758 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR A HIERARCHICAL FEATURE PROPAGATOR | GUILIANO, CHARLES A | 41d |
| 18448797 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR TRACKING WORKER BENEFACTION AT AN ORGANIZATION | WEBB III, JAMES L | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18158646 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TIMEKEEPING AND SCHEDULING | SWARTZ, STEPHEN S | 36d overdue |
| 18476716 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GEOGRAPHY-BASED DATA COLLECTION AND EVALUATION | GOYEA, OLUSEGUN | 5d overdue |
| 18158669 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SCHEDULE EXPERIMENTATION | GUNN, JEREMY L | 9d |
| 18476864 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SELF-SCHEDULE RECOMMENDATIONS | BOND, REED MADISON | 34d |
| 18158758 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR A HIERARCHICAL FEATURE PROPAGATOR | GUILIANO, CHARLES A | 41d |
| 18448797 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR TRACKING WORKER BENEFACTION AT AN ORGANIZATION | WEBB III, JAMES L | — |
| 18158652 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SEQUENCE MIMICKING | HENRY, MATTHEW D | — |
| 18158763 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING MULTIPLE SCHEDULES FOR COMPUTATIONAL EFFICIENCY | OBAID, HAMZEH M | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3624 | 5 |
| 3625 | 3 |
| 3627 | 1 |
| 3623 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18476716 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GEOGRAPHY-BASED DATA COLLECTION AND EVALUATION | GOYEA, OLUSEGUN | 3627 | §101§103 | Final Rejection | 5d overdue | Pending | Sep 28, 2023 |
| 18476864 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SELF-SCHEDULE RECOMMENDATIONS | BOND, REED MADISON | 3624 | §101§103§112 | Final Rejection | 34d | Pending | Sep 28, 2023 |
| 18448797 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR TRACKING WORKER BENEFACTION AT AN ORGANIZATION | WEBB III, JAMES L | 3624 | §101§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 11, 2023 |
| 18448793 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR TRACKING WORKER BENEFACTION AT AN ORGANIZATION | LOFTIS, JOHNNA RONEE | 3625 | §101§103 | Final Rejection | 17d overdue | Pending | Aug 11, 2023 |
| 18158669 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SCHEDULE EXPERIMENTATION | GUNN, JEREMY L | 3624 | §101§103 | Non-Final OA | 9d | Pending | Jan 24, 2023 |
| 18158643 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ADJUSTING A TIME SEQUENCE RESPONSIVE TO A PREDICTED OR A DETECTED AUSTERE EVENT | SCHEUNEMANN, RICHARD N | 3624 | §101§103 | Final Rejection | 8d overdue | Pending | Jan 24, 2023 |
| 18158652 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SEQUENCE MIMICKING | HENRY, MATTHEW D | 3625 | §101 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jan 24, 2023 |
| 18158646 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TIMEKEEPING AND SCHEDULING | SWARTZ, STEPHEN S | 3625 | §101 | Final Rejection | 36d overdue | Pending | Jan 24, 2023 |
| 18158763 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING MULTIPLE SCHEDULES FOR COMPUTATIONAL EFFICIENCY | OBAID, HAMZEH M | 3624 | §101 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 24, 2023 |
| 18158758 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR A HIERARCHICAL FEATURE PROPAGATOR | GUILIANO, CHARLES A | 3623 | §101§112 | Non-Final OA | 41d | Pending | Jan 24, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial