Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
4 pending office actions • 2 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (25%) |
| §103 only | 3 (75%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LETT, THOMAS J | 1 | 83.6% | -35.9% |
| HUYNH, COURTNEY NGUYEN | 1 | 43.1% | +51.0% |
| LEWIS, RALPH A | 1 | 67.0% | +23.4% |
| FARAJ, LINA AHMAD | 1 | 40.2% | +66.6% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18829908 | SMILE TREATMENT PLANNING SYSTEMS AND METHODS | LETT, THOMAS J | 12d |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18449465 | THREE-DIMENSIONAL PRINTED DENTAL APPLIANCES USING SUPPORT STRUCTURES | LEWIS, RALPH A | 28d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18774518 | INDIRECT BONDING TRAY SYSTEM | HUYNH, COURTNEY NGUYEN | 81d overdue |
| 18322028 | ALIGNERS HAVING FORCE REGENERATION | FARAJ, LINA AHMAD | 32d overdue |
| 18449465 | THREE-DIMENSIONAL PRINTED DENTAL APPLIANCES USING SUPPORT STRUCTURES | LEWIS, RALPH A | 28d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3772 | 3 |
| 2611 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18829908 | SMILE TREATMENT PLANNING SYSTEMS AND METHODS | LETT, THOMAS J | 2611 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 12d | Pending | Sep 10, 2024 |
| 18774518 | INDIRECT BONDING TRAY SYSTEM | HUYNH, COURTNEY NGUYEN | 3772 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 81d overdue | Pending | Jul 16, 2024 |
| 18449465 | THREE-DIMENSIONAL PRINTED DENTAL APPLIANCES USING SUPPORT STRUCTURES | LEWIS, RALPH A | 3772 | §101 | Non-Final OA | 28d | Pending | Aug 14, 2023 |
| 18322028 | ALIGNERS HAVING FORCE REGENERATION | FARAJ, LINA AHMAD | 3772 | §103 | Final Rejection | 32d overdue | Pending | May 23, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial